Panama TIEAs: How Information Exchange on Request Works

TIEAs in Panama: How Exchange of Information on Request WorksCopy link to section

A Tax Information Exchange Agreement (TIEA) is a bilateral instrument that lets one country ask another for taxpayer data tied to a specific tax investigation. Panama has signed more than ten such agreements, with partners that include the United States, Canada, Japan, Finland, Denmark, and most recently Ecuador, and it administers them through the Dirección General de Ingresos (DGI) under the Ministry of Economy and Finance. The framework matters to anyone who owns or advises a Panamanian entity, because it determines when a foreign tax authority can reach information held in the country.

This article explains what TIEAs in Panama cover, which agreements exist, how a request is processed, and how the regime interacts with automatic exchange under the Common Reporting Standard. The OECD's 2019 peer review supplies much of the official record. It is most relevant to non-resident company owners, investors, and their tax advisers weighing the practical exposure of a Panama structure.

What a TIEA Is and How It Differs from a Double Tax TreatyCopy link to section

A TIEA does one thing: it allows the competent authorities of two countries to exchange tax information on request, so each can administer and enforce its own tax laws. The OECD released its Model TIEA in April 2002 through the Global Forum Working Group on Effective Exchange of Information, and while the model itself is not binding, it set the template that bilateral agreements follow.

The distinction from a double-tax agreement (DTA) is structural. A DTA allocates taxing rights between two states, lowers withholding rates, and relieves double taxation; a TIEA does none of that.

High-tax countries typically conclude TIEAs with low- or no-tax jurisdictions where no full treaty exists, securing an information channel on the same footing as the exchange clauses of a tax treaty. The aim is to deter offshore evasion and fraud rather than to coordinate tax liabilities.

One feature carries real weight for an entity owner. Under a TIEA the requested party must gather information even when it is not already in its files, and it cannot decline on the ground that it has no domestic tax interest in the matter.

Panama

Company Incorporation in Panama

Set up your company in Panama with Expanship handling registration end to end.

Learn more

Why Panama Signed TIEAs: From Grey List Pressure to OECD Transparency CommitmentsCopy link to section

The TIEA model emerged from OECD work on harmful tax practices, where the absence of effective information exchange was treated as a defining marker of an uncooperative jurisdiction. Panama's entry into the system was a response to that pressure.

Signing a TIEA with France moved the country off the OECD "grey list" of non-implementing jurisdictions. To make exchange possible in law, the legislature passed Law 33, published in the Official Gazette on 30 June 2010, which empowered the government to obtain and share information under international conventions even where no domestic tax interest existed.

The same reforms began dismantling older secrecy mechanisms, including a requirement that the law firms incorporating companies maintain ownership records for bearer-share arrangements. Progress was uneven.

The 2016 "Panama Papers" disclosures exposed what the OECD then described as a "culture and practice of secrecy," and early that year the organisation told G20 finance ministers that the country was back-tracking on its commitment to automatic exchange. Legislative momentum followed: Laws 47 and 51 of October 2016 and Executive Decree 124 of May 2017 brought the FATCA intergovernmental agreement and CRS frameworks into force.

The catalogue of agreements continues to grow. In August 2025 a TIEA was signed with Ecuador, expressly so the country would be removed from Ecuador's list of tax havens.

Panama's TIEA Network: How Many Agreements and With Which CountriesCopy link to section

More than ten TIEAs have been signed, with eight reported in force as of a 2022 source. Confirmed partners named in official and authoritative records appear below.

A single official public list enumerating every agreement and its ratification status was not located during this research; the DGI portal is the authoritative live source. Beyond bilateral agreements, the country is a party to the Multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters, made in Strasbourg on 25 January 1988 and amended by the 2010 Paris Protocol, which supplements the bilateral network.

The country's standing was tested independently. In the OECD's 2019 second-round peer review it received an overall rating of "Partially Compliant," with weaknesses identified in elements A.1, A.2, and C.5.

Panama

Ongoing Compliance in Panama

Keep your Panama entity compliant with filings, returns, and statutory obligations.

Learn more

The Scope of Information Covered Under a Panama TIEACopy link to section

The reach of a TIEA depends on the wording of each agreement, but the pattern is consistent. The US agreement lets both governments seek information on all national taxes, in civil and criminal matters, for tax years beginning on or after 30 November 2007.

The Canadian agreement allows exchange, on request, of information "foreseeably relevant to the administration and enforcement of the domestic laws" concerning all taxes each country imposes or administers, subject to limits set out in the text. Requests may concern a person who is not resident in either country.

In practice the data that can be reached includes banking, ownership, and financial details, subject to strict confidentiality. Law 33 of 2010 lets the competent authority compel production of information held by banks, companies, resident agents, and other entities, regardless of any domestic tax interest.

Supporting record-keeping rules underpin this. Law 2 of 2011 requires resident agents to perform know-your-customer due diligence on all legal entities, reinforced by the anti-money-laundering rules of Law 23 of 2015, and a resident agent must retain that information for five years after the professional relationship ends.

The Request Process: How a Foreign Authority Obtains Information from PanamaCopy link to section

Exchange runs competent authority to competent authority. The DGI, a body under the Ministry of Economy and Finance, is the contact point for all TIEA and exchange-of-information matters.

A valid request, measured against OECD standards, must contain four elements:

1. Taxpayer identification details, such as name, date of birth, and tax identification number.
2. A tax-purpose justification explaining why the information is needed.
3. A clear description of the information sought.
4. Confirmation that all domestic means of obtaining the information have been exhausted.

The receiving authority checks that these criteria are met before acting, and must then collect the relevant material, including from banks, corporations, trusts, and individuals, even when it is not already held but can be obtained locally. Notification and appeal rights available to affected persons should remain compatible with effective exchange, a point the OECD reviews under element B.2.

No public data was found on formal response deadlines or processing fees for incoming requests handled by the DGI. As a general benchmark, the OECD recommends a 90-day response window, with an interim acknowledgement where a full reply is not yet possible.

Panama

Panama Incorporation Pricing

See transparent pricing to incorporate and maintain a company in Panama.

View pricing

Foreseeable Relevance and the Limits on Fishing ExpeditionsCopy link to section

The exchange-of-information-on-request standard turns on a single threshold: information must be "foreseeably relevant" to the administration or enforcement of the requesting country's tax laws. This is the OECD's agreed test, and it requires a plausible link between the data sought and an active investigation or proceeding.

Speculative or exploratory requests fall outside it. Authorities receiving a request must confirm relevance and detailed justification precisely to block "fishing expeditions."

For the requesting state, the practical consequence is the four-part discipline already described: identify the taxpayer, describe the information, state the tax purpose, and confirm domestic measures have been exhausted before the country is obliged to act. Group requests covering multiple unnamed taxpayers who share a pattern of behaviour are permitted under the updated 2012 OECD standards, an issue assessed in the 2019 second-round review.

Confidentiality Safeguards and Use of Exchanged InformationCopy link to section

Data moving under a TIEA carries confidentiality obligations. It may be disclosed to a court or judicial forum only for the purpose of determining the tax matter in question, and not to anyone outside that narrow circle.

The receiving country must protect the data as carefully as its own sensitive material, and use of the information is restricted to tax-related matters. Unauthorised sharing or misuse can attract legal penalties.

These same protections extend to exchange under the US FATCA intergovernmental agreement, which is built on top of the TIEA and adopts its confidentiality and use limitations. Persons in the country hold notification and appeal rights under domestic law, although the 2019 peer review flagged concerns over whether those rights are fully compatible with effective exchange in practice, listing element B.2 for follow-up.

No specific public data was found on whether a standalone data-protection statute governs exchanged information beyond the confidentiality clauses written into each agreement and into Law 33 of 2010.

How TIEAs Sit Alongside CRS and Panama's Broader Transparency FrameworkCopy link to section

TIEAs and the Common Reporting Standard answer different questions. A TIEA is request-based and case-specific; CRS is automatic and delivers bulk annual account data, so the two operate as complements rather than alternatives.

Panama committed in 2016 to begin automatic exchange in 2018 and signed the Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement on automatic exchange of financial account information in January 2018. The domestic framework was set by Law 51 of 2016, dated 27 October 2016, and regulated by Executive Decree No. 124 of 12 May 2017, which fixed due-diligence procedures and reporting deadlines for financial institutions.

US persons sit under a separate channel. The country signed a Model 1 IGA with the US Treasury, and its banks are required to comply with FATCA.

The Multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters can also serve as the legal basis for a request from a Convention partner that has no bilateral TIEA in place. Reports submitted under FATCA and CRS now pass automated validation on the DGI portal, which issues an electronic acknowledgement as conclusive proof of compliance, per guidance updated December 2025.

What TIEAs Mean in Practice for Non-Resident Owners and Their AdvisersCopy link to section

Information can still cross borders even where no full tax treaty or FATCA agreement exists, because a TIEA or the Multilateral Convention provides the channel. For a non-resident owner, this means cross-border holdings face greater scrutiny, and undeclared taxable assets can trigger an investigation prompted by an exchange.

A working assumption is the safest starting point. Treat your home tax authority as able to request information from the DGI where a TIEA or Convention relationship exists; assume CRS already delivers annual account data automatically; and recognise that FATCA applies to US persons regardless of TIEA status.

The country's "Partially Compliant" rating from the 2019 review, covering elements A.1, A.2, and C.5, signals that beneficial ownership data and accounting records were not always fully available in practice. Real-world responses may therefore be slower or less complete than the treaty text suggests, though that gap is the target of ongoing reform rather than a permanent feature.

Each sociedad anónima must appoint a resident agent, who is obliged to update the company's ownership information annually with the Public Registry. That register is the primary data store reached under a request, which is why accurate, current records reduce the risk of friction during an inquiry.

Agreements of this kind generally stay in force indefinitely until a party terminates them under the relevant clause. Advisers should track the next OECD peer-review rating, any new agreements published through the DGI, and the country's standing on EU or FATF lists, since each shifts the practical risk profile of a structure.

ConclusionCopy link to section

A TIEA gives a foreign tax authority a defined, request-based route to information held in Panama, sitting alongside the automatic flows of CRS and FATCA rather than replacing them. For a non-resident owner, the realistic position is that ownership, banking, and accounting records can be reached when a valid request meets the foreseeable-relevance test. The "Partially Compliant" peer-review rating tempers that reach in practice, but the direction of reform is toward fuller cooperation. Sound record-keeping and accurate home-country reporting are the practical defences.

How Expanship Can Help Your Business in PanamaCopy link to section

Expanship helps foreign owners stay ahead of exchange-of-information obligations by keeping resident-agent records, beneficial ownership data, and accounting documentation accurate and current, so a TIEA or CRS request meets a compliant entity rather than a gap. The same support extends across the full life of a Panamanian company.

• Company formation and structuring for non-resident owners
• Resident agent and registered office services
• Tax registration and routine filings with the DGI
• Ongoing compliance and corporate maintenance
• Accounting and bookkeeping aligned with record-retention rules
• Introductions to banks for account opening

To discuss your structure and its exchange-of-information exposure, contact Expanship Panama.

Frequently Asked QuestionsCopy link to section