Listen to this article
0:00 / 0:00

Key Takeaways

  • A double taxation agreement allocates taxing rights between countries and can reduce or eliminate tax charged twice on the same income.
  • Belize's treaty network is limited, and the CARICOM multilateral agreement covers only a defined set of member states.
  • Permanent establishment and residency tie-breaker rules determine where income is taxed and who qualifies as a treaty resident.
  • Claiming treaty benefits requires proper documentation, and anti-abuse measures like the principal purpose test can deny relief to artificial structures.

Tax treaties in Belize cover a narrow field. The country has five tax agreements in force, counting the CARICOM multilateral treaty as one, and only three bilateral double taxation arrangements: with the United Kingdom, Austria, and Switzerland. For a foreign owner deciding whether to incorporate or hold income through a Belize entity, that thin network is the central fact, and it shapes everything that follows.

This article explains what those agreements do, who they reach, how taxing rights and residency are determined, and what a non-resident realistically gains or does not gain from them. It matters most to foreign business owners, investors, and their advisers weighing a Belize structure against the tax rules of their own home country, which in most major economies has no treaty with Belize at all. The US Department of Commerce confirms, for example, that there is no bilateral taxation treaty between the United States and Belize.

A double taxation agreement (DTA) stops the same income from being taxed twice: once in the country where it arises and again in the country where the recipient resides. It does this by assigning the right to tax particular income to one country, reducing or removing the other country's claim, and by setting up a route to resolve disputes between the two tax authorities.

These treaties usually reach income tax, corporate tax, and withholding taxes on dividends, interest, and royalties. Under a DTA, a resident of one treaty partner may pay a reduced rate, or nothing at all, on certain income from the other; the precise relief depends on the country and the type of income.

Most income tax treaties carry a "saving clause," which blocks a citizen or resident from using the treaty to escape tax on income sourced in their own country. The CARICOM-style agreement was built with a different aim in mind: to ease trade and investment between member states by cutting the effective tax burden on cross-border income.

Belize

Company Incorporation in Belize

Set up your company in Belize with Expanship handling registration end to end.

The headline figure comes from the country's own response to the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework peer review: five tax agreements in force, with the CARICOM multilateral treaty counted as one (it covers ten partners). In its full List of Tax Agreements, Belize identified thirteen instruments in total: three bilateral treaties plus the CARICOM Agreement concluded with ten partners.

The three bilateral arrangements are set out below.

Belize bilateral double taxation treaties
Partner Status and notes
United Kingdom Signed 19 December 1947 as a UK/British Honduras treaty; entered into force 21 January 1948; continues to apply to Belize
Austria Covers taxes on income and on capital; listed on the official Belize Tax Service legal portal
Switzerland Cited in professional secondary sources; specific instrument details not confirmed from a primary source

Some advisory sources publish a higher count, listing each CARICOM member state as a separate bilateral entry. That inflates the total and conflicts with the OECD peer-review finding of five agreements in force; the correct approach treats CARICOM as a single multilateral instrument.

Separate from its DTAs, the firm maintains 14 Tax Information Exchange Agreements with Australia, Belgium, France, Netherlands, United Kingdom, Finland, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Iceland, Ireland, Greenland, the Faroe Islands, and Portugal. These exchange information; they do not relieve double taxation.

No US treaty

There is no income tax treaty between the United States and Belize, and no bilateral investment treaty either. US persons gain no treaty-based exemption from a Belize structure.

The regional agreement is the backbone of Belize's treaty position. Its full title is the Agreement Among the Governments of the Member States of the Caribbean Community for the Avoidance of Double Taxation, signed in St. Michael, Barbados on 6 July 1994. Domestically, Belize gives it effect through the Income Tax (Avoidance of Double Taxation) (CARICOM) Act, Chapter 56.

The treaty entered into force for Belize on 30 November 1994. Ten member states are parties, each with its own commencement date.

CARICOM DTA parties and entry-into-force dates
Member state In force from
Trinidad & Tobago 29 November 1994
Belize 30 November 1994
Jamaica 16 February 1995
Saint Lucia 22 May 1995
Grenada 1 March 1996
Dominica 19 June 1996
St. Kitts and Nevis 8 May 1997
Guyana 26 November 1997
Antigua and Barbuda 18 February 1998
St. Vincent 12 February 1998

Not every CARICOM member belongs to the tax treaty. The Bahamas is a full community member but is not a signatory, and Montserrat, Haiti, and Suriname are not listed as parties either. You can confirm the signatory list through the CARICOM Secretariat.

The agreement applies to taxes on income, profits or gains, and capital gains arising in a member state. Its drafting follows the UN Model Double Taxation Convention of 1980 rather than the OECD Model, reflecting a design seen as friendlier to developing economies.

No amendments have touched the treaty since 1994. In March 2025, the CARICOM Council for Finance and Planning agreed to update it for current global tax standards, adding provisions on information exchange, dispute resolution, and anti-avoidance measures against profit-shifting.

Belize

Ongoing Compliance in Belize

Keep your Belize entity compliant with filings, returns, and statutory obligations.

The CARICOM treaty uses a source-country rule. Under Article 5, regardless of a person's nationality or residence, income is taxable only in the member state where it arises, subject to the exceptions written into the agreement. This is a notable departure from the residence-led logic of most modern treaties.

One gap carries real weight for cross-border business: the CARICOM treaty is silent on the concept of permanent establishment (PE). That silence leaves uncertainty over when activity in another member state creates a taxable presence.

By contrast, the 1947 UK arrangement does contain a PE concept. A Belize enterprise trading in the UK through a permanent establishment there may be taxed only on the profits attributable to that establishment.

The PE question also feeds Belize's domestic rules. Foreign-sourced active business income that is not attributable to a PE in the source state is taxable in Belize at the rate applying to the company's operations. Under the CARICOM treaty, royalties arising in one member state and paid to a resident of another are taxed only in the source state, capped at 15% of the gross amount.

Belize sets tax residency mainly through physical presence: at least 183 days in the country during a calendar year. An individual may also be treated as resident by being domiciled in the jurisdiction, whatever the day count, and obtaining formal permanent residency can establish tax residency without meeting the 183-day test.

The treaties themselves offer little of the machinery a modern adviser expects. Neither the CARICOM Agreement nor the 1947 UK arrangement contains detailed tie-breaker articles of the OECD Model type, such as habitual abode or centre of vital interests; the regional treaty leans on source-country allocation instead, and the UK instrument predates those drafting conventions.

Two general principles still hold. Citizenship of a treaty country does not by itself confer treaty residency: the residence criteria in the specific treaty must be met. Many treaties also require the claimant to be the beneficial owner of the income, so a conduit entity will not qualify.

Belize

Belize Incorporation Pricing

See transparent pricing to incorporate and maintain a company in Belize.

For a Belize company seeking business-tax exemption on the basis of foreign tax residence, the burden is evidentiary. The entity must produce documents proving it is tax resident elsewhere; detailed guidance on the exact documents, timelines, and process from the Belize Tax Service remains under development.

Reporting obligations sit alongside any claim, and they cut against secrecy. Belize will spontaneously share information with the tax authority of the jurisdiction a company claims as its residence, including beneficial ownership details. A company that cannot evidence foreign tax residence becomes subject to Belize tax, including on passive income.

Administration runs through online portals and registration deadlines:

  1. Register with the Income Tax Department within 30 days of commencing business, submitting incorporation documents and details of activities.
  2. Appoint a local representative if the company is non-resident.
  3. Obtain a Tax Identification Number (TIN).
  4. File and pay business and income tax returns through the IRIS Belize portal; AEOI/CRS reporting uses a separate system.

No specific inbound treaty-relief claim form (the equivalent of a US W-8BEN or a European certificate of residence) has been confirmed for Belize; verify the current requirement with the Belize Tax Service before relying on a procedure. On overseas passive income such as dividends, interest, royalties, and net capital gains, Belize taxes at 5% and allows a foreign tax credit to offset foreign tax paid on the same receipts.

International standards now require treaties to contain anti-abuse provisions. Under BEPS Action 6, a committed jurisdiction must include either a Principal Purpose Test (PPT) combined with a Limitation on Benefits (LOB) clause, or a detailed LOB rule with a supplementary measure such as a conduit-arrangement PPT. The minimum standard also calls for an express preamble statement on non-taxation, plus one of three prescribed methods of countering treaty shopping.

Belize participates in the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework and is subject to the Action 6 peer review on treaty shopping; the fourth peer review assessed its compliance. The precise anti-abuse method embedded in each bilateral treaty is not confirmed from a primary source here, so advisers should consult the OECD fourth peer review report directly.

The regional treaty shows its age on this point. Having gone unamended since 1994, the CARICOM DTA was not drafted with BEPS-era anti-abuse language, and the update process agreed in 2025 is meant to supply exactly those protections.

The MLI modifies existing bilateral treaties to add anti-abuse and other measures without replacing them. It is not a standalone treaty or an amending protocol; it operates alongside the treaties a country chooses to designate.

Belize signed the MLI on 11 January 2019, and it entered into force for the country on 1 August 2022. Globally there are 104 signatories. You can check coverage on the OECD MLI page.

A treaty is affected only if it is a "Covered Tax Agreement," which requires both partner countries to notify the OECD of that specific treaty. So whether the UK, Austrian, or Swiss arrangement has been modified depends on matching notifications by each side.

Belize multilateral tax instruments
Instrument Signed Notes
CRS Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement 29 October 2015 Automatic exchange of financial account information
Country-by-Country Report MCAA 20 June 2017 Banks transmit foreign-resident account information
MLI 11 January 2019 In force 1 August 2022
STTR MLI 19 September 2024 Two Covered Tax Agreements notified

The Subject to Tax Rule MLI, signed in Paris on 19 September 2024, is a treaty-based rule giving the source state a minimum level of taxation on specified intragroup payments taxed below 9% in the payee's jurisdiction. Belize notified two Covered Tax Agreements under it.

The plain takeaway is that the network is small. Most major capital-export jurisdictions, including the United States, Canada, Germany, China, Japan, and Australia, have no DTA with Belize at all. For owners resident in those countries, a Belize entity delivers no treaty relief, and home-country withholding and income tax rules apply in full to Belize-sourced income.

US persons sit in the sharpest version of this position. With no US treaty in place, they receive no special exemption from a Belize structure, and their relief comes only from US domestic law such as the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion and the Foreign Tax Credit; US worldwide filing obligations continue regardless of Belize residency.

The exemption route is also conditional. All Belize companies are subject to business tax on turnover unless the entity can prove foreign tax residence and show that its foreign-sourced income comes from a permanent establishment in the source state. Firms earning only foreign-source income with no Belize presence may still qualify, but only under reporting requirements aligned with international transparency standards.

Several further constraints deserve attention before you rely on any structure:

  • The CARICOM treaty's silence on permanent establishment leaves cross-border activity within the region exposed to uncertainty.
  • Belize will spontaneously share beneficial ownership and residence details with claimed home-country authorities, so confidentiality is not a planning tool.
  • Some international banks apply enhanced due diligence or restrictions to Belize-incorporated entities.
  • The 1947 UK arrangement predates modern treaty standards and lacks a full PPT/LOB suite; verify its modified state against the MLI matching database before relying on it.

Belize offers a compact treaty position: five agreements in force, three bilateral treaties, the CARICOM multilateral framework, and a growing set of transparency and anti-abuse instruments layered on top. For a foreign owner whose home country has no treaty with Belize, which describes most major economies, the practical relief from these agreements is limited, and home-country rules will usually govern the tax outcome. The country's exemption regime depends on proving foreign tax residence and a foreign permanent establishment, backed by real reporting and information exchange. Treat a Belize structure as a matter to test against your own residence rules, with professional advice, rather than as a source of treaty benefits in itself.

Expanship advises foreign owners on how Belize's treaty position and exemption rules affect their structure, including residency evidence, reporting duties, and whether any DTA actually applies to their home country. That guidance sits within a wider set of services for running a foreign-owned entity in the jurisdiction.

  • Company formation and structuring for non-resident owners
  • Registered agent and registered office services
  • Tax registration, TIN setup, and return filing
  • Ongoing compliance and reporting management
  • Accounting and bookkeeping
  • Introductions to banking partners

To discuss your situation, contact Expanship Belize.

No. There is no income tax treaty between the United States and Belize, and no bilateral investment treaty either, as confirmed by the US Department of Commerce. US persons receive no treaty-based exemption from a Belize structure and rely instead on domestic tools like the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion and Foreign Tax Credit.

According to Belize's own response to the OECD Inclusive Framework, it has five tax agreements in force, with the CARICOM treaty counted as one covering ten partners. There are three bilateral double taxation treaties, with the United Kingdom, Austria, and Switzerland.

It is a regional treaty signed in Barbados on 6 July 1994 to avoid double taxation among Caribbean Community member states, in force for Belize since 30 November 1994. It uses a source-country rule, so income is generally taxed only in the member state where it arises, and it has not been amended since signing.

Only in limited circumstances. A company seeking exemption must prove it is tax resident in another country and that its foreign-sourced income comes from a permanent establishment there, while Belize will spontaneously share residence and beneficial ownership data with the claimed home jurisdiction. A company that cannot evidence foreign tax residence becomes subject to Belize tax, including on passive income.

Yes. Belize signed the MLI on 11 January 2019, with entry into force on 1 August 2022, and signed the Subject to Tax Rule MLI on 19 September 2024, notifying two Covered Tax Agreements. It has also signed the CRS and Country-by-Country reporting agreements for automatic information exchange.

Royalties arising in one CARICOM member state and paid to a resident of another are taxed only in the source state, at a rate not exceeding 15% of the gross amount. The treaty's source-country approach means the residence state generally does not also tax that income.