Listen to this article
0:00 / 0:00

Key Takeaways

  • Economic substance regulations apply to Marshall Islands entities carrying on defined relevant activities, with some entities falling outside the regime's scope.
  • Meeting the regime requires passing a three-part test covering direction and management, adequate employees, premises and expenditure, and core income-generating activities.
  • Pure equity holding companies and shipping businesses are subject to special rules that differ from the standard substance requirements.
  • Failing the economic substance test carries consequences that foreign owners and their advisers should understand before they arise.

The Economic Substance Regulations in the Marshall Islands require certain entities formed in the jurisdiction to demonstrate genuine business operations there when they earn income from defined activities. These rules apply to non-resident domestic entities (NRDEs) and foreign maritime entities (FMEs) that carry on a relevant activity, and they are administered by the Registrar of Non-resident Domestic Corporations. The official position and reporting tools are published by the Marshall Islands Registry.

This article explains what the regime covers, which entities fall inside it, how the substance test works, and what happens when a company fails to meet it. It will matter most to foreign owners and advisers of Marshall Islands corporations, partnerships, LLCs, and vessel-owning maritime entities.

For about two decades, the OECD and the European Union worked to identify tax practices that shift profit away from where value is genuinely created. Substance requirements for geographically mobile activities are now assessed across more than 130 countries under the OECD Inclusive Framework on BEPS, specifically BEPS Action 5.

The Marshall Islands introduced its economic substance regime in 2018 in direct response to that international pressure. The objective was straightforward: companies registered in the jurisdiction should carry on real activity rather than serve only as conduits for tax avoidance.

This is not an isolated reform. The Cayman Islands, Bermuda, and other no- or nominal-tax centres adopted comparable rules over the same period, which means a foreign owner familiar with one regime will recognise the structure of another.

Marshall Is.

Company Incorporation in Marshall Islands

Set up your company in Marshall Islands with Expanship handling registration end to end.

The governing instrument is the Republic of the Marshall Islands Economic Substance Regulations, 2018. Promulgated by the Registrar under authority drawn from the Business Corporations Act and the Marshall Islands Revised Code, the rules took effect on 1 January 2019 and were amended on 21 February 2019 and again on 29 August 2019.

At the centre sits the economic substance test in Section 4(1). It requires that every "relevant entity" have economic substance in the jurisdiction for each financial period in which it derives income from a "relevant activity." Section 7 addresses what follows when that test is not satisfied.

Supplementary guidelines, last updated in January 2020, accompany the text. The official Guidance and Frequently Asked Questions document should be read alongside the regulations, and you can review the full guidance and FAQ before deciding how the rules apply to your structure.

The Registrar enforces the regime and receives all filings. Reports are submitted through the Registry's secure online portal, which exists in an individual and a consolidated version.

Substance obligations attach only where a company earns income from a defined activity. The regulations name nine:

  • Distribution and service centre business
  • Financing and leasing business
  • Fund management business
  • Headquarters business
  • Holding company business
  • Intellectual-property business
  • Shipping business
  • Banking business
  • Insurance business

Two of these warrant a caveat. Although banking and insurance appear on the list, the RMI Associations Law prohibits all NRDEs and FMEs from issuing insurance policies or assuming insurance risk, so for those entity types banking and insurance operate as exclusions in practice.

The shipping category is drawn broadly. It captures owning, operating, chartering, or managing a vessel, and extends to the use, maintenance, and rental of shipping containers.

Scope is activity-by-activity. A company tests its substance only against the relevant activity from which it actually derives income; where no income arises from a relevant activity, no substance is required for that part of the business in that period.

Marshall Is.

Ongoing Compliance in Marshall Islands

Keep your Marshall Islands entity compliant with filings, returns, and statutory obligations.

A "relevant entity" falls into one of two groups. The first covers non-resident domestic corporations, partnerships, and LLCs that are tax-resident in the Marshall Islands. The second covers foreign corporations, partnerships, limited partnerships, and LLCs, including foreign maritime entities, that are centrally managed and controlled there.

A company sits outside the regime if it can show the Registrar, with objective evidence, that it is tax resident somewhere else. The Registrar may accept residency elsewhere where the entity is subject to another jurisdiction's tax regime by reason of domicile, residence, or a similar criterion.

Acceptable proof includes the assessment or payment of a tax liability abroad, or other evidence of being subject to a foreign tax system. An entity disregarded for US income-tax purposes can instead supply a statement signed under penalty of perjury by an external tax adviser or a C-level officer confirming that all of its income has been reported on the parent's corporate tax return.

Out of scope is not the same as no filing

Even an entity that conducts no relevant activity must still submit an annual self-declaration confirming exactly that. Silence is not compliance.

One point reassures foreign owners worried about changing their company's character. Complying with the regulations does not turn an NRDE or FME into a resident domestic entity, and obtaining an Employer Identification Number in the jurisdiction does not have that effect either.

Where a relevant entity carries on a relevant activity, it must meet a test built from three limbs. The activity must be directed and managed in the jurisdiction; the entity must maintain an adequate number of employees, adequate physical presence, and adequate expenditure there; and it must conduct its core income-generating activities (CIGA) in the jurisdiction.

These requirements are set out in Section 4 of the regulations. All three limbs apply at the same time, so a shortfall on any one of them means the test fails for that financial period.

Marshall Is.

Marshall Islands Incorporation Pricing

See transparent pricing to incorporate and maintain a company in Marshall Islands.

Direction and management is about where real decisions are made. The relevant activity must be directed and managed from within the jurisdiction, which means board meetings held there with a quorum of decision-makers physically present, at a frequency suited to the nature and importance of the activity.

There is no set number of meetings. Adequacy depends on the facts of the entity and the weight of the relevant activity within its wider business.

Records follow the meetings. Minutes must be kept in the jurisdiction, and those making decisions must actually attend in person rather than by proxy from abroad.

One category escapes this limb entirely: a pure equity holding company is not required to be directed and managed locally.

The published text fixes no headcount and no monetary floor. Adequacy is judged against the level of relevant activity the company carries on, so a larger operation is expected to show more.

In practice the entity must demonstrate a suitable number of employees, a physical presence such as an office, and operating expenditure that matches the scale and nature of the business. Employees are expected to be physically present in the jurisdiction.

A virtual office will not carry an entity whose operations genuinely demand staff on the ground. Where the activity is substantial, both the people and the spending must reflect it.

CIGA are the activities of central importance to earning the entity's income. Where they relate to a relevant activity, they must be carried out within the jurisdiction.

Delegation is permitted, within limits. A relevant entity can satisfy the CIGA limb where another person performs the activities on its behalf, provided the entity can monitor and control that work, the activities take place in the jurisdiction, and the same substance is not double-counted across multiple entities.

That last condition matters where a single local service provider supports several companies. The provider's resources are weighed when the Registrar assesses adequacy, and the entity must still show genuine supervision of what it has delegated.

What counts as CIGA varies by sector:

CIGA examples by relevant activity
Activity Illustrative CIGA
Shipping Managing crew, including hiring, paying, and overseeing crew members
Intellectual property Taking strategic decisions and bearing the principal risks of acquiring, exploiting, and protecting the intangible asset; or conducting the underlying trading that generates third-party income
Holding company All activities related to the holding business, though tested under a different standard

High-risk IP business carries a heavier burden. For such a business the CIGA test is presumed not to be met for a fiscal period unless the entity produces sufficient evidence to rebut that presumption, as Section 6 provides.

Two categories follow tailored standards rather than the full three-limb test.

A pure equity holding company owns shares or equitable interests in other entities. It may not conduct commercial activity, and its income may come only from dividends and capital gains.

Such a company can meet its substance obligation by complying with all applicable filing requirements under the Business Corporations Act, Revised Partnership Act, Limited Partnership Act, or Limited Liability Companies Act, including payment of the related fees. It must also hold adequate human resources and premises for holding and managing its participations.

The reduced standard is real. In practice a pure equity holding company may satisfy these requirements by maintaining a registered agent in the jurisdiction under the Associations Law, and it is exempt from both the directed-and-managed limb and the requirement to conduct CIGA locally.

The regime recognises that much of a vessel's value-generating work happens in transit, not at a fixed onshore location. A shipping entity may satisfy the test through the operation of the vessel in international traffic, including managing the crew aboard, maintaining the vessel, and overseeing voyages.

The assessment also looks at compliance more broadly. The Registrar considers whether the entity meets its obligations under the Associations Law and the Maritime Act 1990, including applicable IMO and ILO standards, customs and manning requirements, and whether all financial obligations to the jurisdiction have been settled.

Private yachts are treated differently. Owning, operating, or managing a private yacht is not a shipping business, so an entity confined to that falls outside the relevant-activity definition and is exempt from the substance test.

Failure does not produce an instant penalty. The Registrar first issues a notice setting out the reasons for its determination, any penalties that apply, and other information it considers relevant.

Financial exposure escalates with repetition, and Section 7 sets the tiers.

Penalties under Section 7
Trigger Maximum fine Additional consequence
First failure for a financial period USD 50,000 per relevant financial period Revocation of formation documents and dissolution, or both
Second consecutive failure USD 100,000 Revocation and dissolution, or both

Beyond fines, information moves across borders. Where an entity fails the test for a financial period, the Registrar must forward the relevant information to the competent authority of any EU Member State where the parent, ultimate parent, or ultimate beneficial owner resides, and, for entities organised outside the jurisdiction, to the authority where the entity is organised.

The knock-on effects can outweigh the fine. Authorities elsewhere may decline to recognise a structure that lacks substance, putting treaty benefits and banking relationships at risk.

There is also a standalone filing duty that binds every NRDE and FME, whether or not it conducts a relevant activity. Reports go through the Registry's online portal within 12 months of the entity's anniversary date, and missing that deadline can lead to penalties or annulment.

The practical message for a foreign owner is that the Marshall Islands tests substance only where a company earns income from a defined activity, and even then the standard is calibrated to the activity rather than fixed at an arbitrary threshold. Shipping entities and pure equity holding companies, the two structures most common in the jurisdiction, both benefit from lighter, purpose-built versions of the test.

The single step worth taking first is to classify your entity honestly: confirm whether it derives income from a relevant activity, and if not, file the self-declaration on time. That one decision determines whether you face a full substance assessment or a simple annual confirmation.

Expanship helps foreign owners determine whether their entity falls within the economic substance regime, prepare and file the correct report through the Registry portal, and document any claim to tax residency elsewhere. The same team supports the wider needs of a Marshall Islands company across its life cycle.

  • Company and maritime entity formation
  • Registered agent and registered office services
  • Ongoing compliance and filing management, including portal submissions
  • Accounting and bookkeeping support
  • Economic-substance assessment and beneficial-ownership assistance
  • Introductions to banking partners

To discuss how these obligations apply to your structure, contact Expanship Marshall Islands.

It applies to relevant entities that derive income from a relevant activity, so not every company carries the full test. Entities outside that scope, including those that conduct no relevant activity, must still file an annual self-declaration confirming their position.

A first failure for a financial period draws a fine of up to USD 50,000, with possible revocation of formation documents and dissolution. A second consecutive failure raises the maximum fine to USD 100,000 and again exposes the entity to dissolution under Section 7.

Yes, an NRDE or FME treated as tax resident in another jurisdiction can fall out of scope by giving the Registrar objective evidence. Acceptable proof includes the assessment or payment of tax abroad, or, for a US-disregarded entity, a perjury-backed statement that its income is reported on the parent's return.

Pure equity holding companies face a reduced standard. They are exempt from the directed-and-managed limb and the local CIGA requirement, and may meet the test by complying with statutory filing obligations and maintaining adequate resources, often through a registered agent.

They are, because the regime accepts that much of a vessel's income-generating work occurs in transit. A shipping entity can satisfy the test through operating the vessel in international traffic, managing its crew, maintaining the vessel, and meeting its obligations under the Maritime Act 1990 and related international standards.

Every NRDE and FME files through the Registry's secure online portal within 12 months of the entity's anniversary date. Missing the deadline can result in penalties or annulment, even for an entity that earns no income from a relevant activity.