Listen to this article
0:00 / 0:00

Key Takeaways

  • Director and shareholder details in the Marshall Islands are kept largely out of public view, with only limited corporate information accessible through the registrar.
  • Beneficial ownership must be reported under the disclosure regime, but access to that information is restricted rather than open to the general public.
  • Nominee directors and shareholders can add a layer of privacy, though confidentiality still gives way when authorities or qualifying foreign requests apply.
  • Non-resident owners should weigh data-handling safeguards against the legal limits on privacy before structuring a Marshall Islands company.

Company privacy in the Marshall Islands rests on a "closed" corporate registry: the identities of shareholders, directors, and beneficial owners of a non-resident entity are not required to be publicly disclosed. The framework comes from the Associations Law of 1990, administered by The Trust Company of the Marshall Islands (TCMI) as Registrar, with technical support from International Registries, Inc. (IRI), whose privacy policy sets out how registrant data is handled. This applies to foreign owners who incorporate a Non-Resident Domestic Entity without any local residency or physical presence in the jurisdiction.

This article explains what stays confidential, what a public search reveals, who can compel disclosure, and the practical limits that follow from the jurisdiction's treaty position. It is most relevant to non-resident business owners, investors, and their advisers weighing confidentiality against international reporting exposure.

The Associations Law of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, enacted in 1990, governs corporations, limited liability companies, and partnerships. Within it, the Business Corporations Act covers corporations, while LLCs fall under the Limited Liability Company Act of 1996.

These statutes were modelled on Delaware corporate law, which shapes both their structure and their treatment of confidential information. The Associations Law provides that the identities of shareholders, directors, and beneficial owners need not be filed for public inspection.

The regime grew out of a 1990 agreement between the Marshallese government and TCMI, which received authority to administer corporate registrations. One material reform sits behind the privacy framework: a 2019 amendment to the Business Corporations Act eliminated bearer shares entirely, closing a route that had historically allowed anonymous ownership transfers.

The jurisdiction pairs a 0% offshore tax regime with anti-money-laundering controls aligned to Financial Action Task Force standards and an Economic Substance Regulations regime in force since 2018. Confidentiality here is therefore a policy choice about public disclosure, not an absence of regulation.

Marshall Is.

Company Incorporation in Marshall Islands

Set up your company in Marshall Islands with Expanship handling registration end to end.

A standard Company Search Report draws official data from IRI and shows a limited set of fields. It does not extend to ownership or management.

Public vs confidential company information
Publicly accessible (Company Search Report) Kept confidential
Full legal name Shareholder names
Registration number Director and officer names
Incorporation date Beneficial owner identity
Current standing (Active, Inactive, Struck Off, Annulled) Financial records and accounts
Registered agent name and address Member and manager details (LLCs)
Registered office address

The registry is "closed," meaning directors and shareholders are not part of a standard search unless the company has voluntarily elected to file them. Disclosure of the names of shareholders, members, limited partners, directors, managers, and officers remains optional.

Non-resident companies are not required to file audited accounts, annual returns, or any financial statements, ownership details, or shareholder information. There are no mandated accounting frameworks, so record-keeping obligations are minimal.

The fee for a Certificate of Formation is USD 650, followed by an annual maintenance fee of USD 450, per IRI's schedule. Neither filing adds ownership data to the public record.

Incorporation documents do not carry the names of shareholders or directors, so no such names appear on the public file. A single director suffices, and that director may be a corporate entity; the same is true of the sole required shareholder, and the two roles may be held by the same person or entity.

No residency requirement applies to directors or shareholders. For LLCs, the names of members and managers are not recorded or disclosed in any central register.

A corporation must hold an annual shareholders' meeting, but it may take place anywhere in the world and may be conducted by telephone or electronic means. LLCs carry no obligation to issue shares or hold shareholder meetings at all.

Marshall Is.

Ongoing Compliance in Marshall Islands

Keep your Marshall Islands entity compliant with filings, returns, and statutory obligations.

There is no public register of company owners, members, or managers. Beneficial ownership information is held privately and disclosed only to the registered agent at formation and to financial institutions during account opening.

The jurisdiction has not signed the OECD Common Reporting Standard or the Multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters. It does maintain a bilateral FATCA Model 1B agreement with the United States, effective 2017, under which US persons holding accounts are reported to the IRS; there is no automatic exchange with EU member states, the UK, or other CRS signatories.

International expectations continue to tighten around this area. In March 2022, the FATF agreed stronger beneficial ownership standards under Recommendation 24, requiring competent authorities to hold adequate, accurate, and up-to-date ownership information.

How the jurisdiction performs against those standards is documented in its mutual evaluation. The APG evaluation rated it Compliant on 14 and Largely Compliant on 21 of the FATF 40 Recommendations, while scoring neither Highly nor Substantially Effective on any of the effectiveness measures.

Watch the direction of travel

The IMF has flagged that beneficial ownership transparency requirements, including for existing entities, need full implementation so authorities can access up-to-date information promptly. Confidentiality from the public is settled; access for competent authorities is the area under reform pressure.

TCMI serves as the RMI Registrar of Non-resident Domestic Entities, with IRI and its affiliates providing administrative and technical support. IRI, based in Reston, Virginia, operates both the corporate registry and the well-known ship registry on behalf of the government.

The corporate register itself sits in Switzerland, which is why extracts can be apostilled there. IRI maintains a network of 28 offices in major business and financial centres, where entities can be formed and documents filed.

Every entity must appoint a registered agent licensed and based in the Marshall Islands; that agent receives official correspondence and legal documents. Before issuing a Certificate of Incorporation under the official RMI seal, the Registrar runs a name-availability check and reviews filings for compliance with the Associations Law.

Marshall Is.

Marshall Islands Incorporation Pricing

See transparent pricing to incorporate and maintain a company in Marshall Islands.

Nominee services for both shareholders and directors are permitted, allowing professional nominees to appear on file while the beneficial owner retains control through private agreement. Where a nominee shareholder is used, a Declaration of Trust is a standard part of the Non-Resident Domestic Corporation formation package, documenting the underlying ownership.

These arrangements are private contractual matters between the registered agent or nominee provider and the beneficial owner; they are not filed with the Registrar. The structure is commonly used by entrepreneurs in competitive sectors, high-net-worth individuals, and families building wealth-holding vehicles.

TCMI and IRI are the two institutional custodians of registrant data. Both treat themselves as data controllers under the definition in the EU General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 and have published a privacy policy referencing that standard.

This is a private contractual standard rather than domestic law. The jurisdiction has no standalone data-protection statute equivalent to the GDPR and no dedicated data protection authority, so the GDPR self-alignment is voluntary.

Under the published policy, personal information may be released when legally compelled by a subpoena, court order, or similar process, or where disclosure is needed for national security, law enforcement, or prevention of financial loss. Requests to access, correct, port, or delete data may be submitted through the contact channel named in the IRI/TCMI privacy policy.

Confidentiality from the public does not mean immunity from disclosure. The non-signature of the OECD Multilateral Convention means there is no multilateral automatic or on-request tax exchange with the 100-plus signatory jurisdictions, a structural difference from the British Virgin Islands, Cayman, and Bermuda, all of which have signed it.

The bilateral FATCA agreement with the United States, effective 2017, still creates a reporting channel for US persons through RMI financial institutions. The OECD's AEOI commitments document lists the jurisdiction with a committed CRS start, though without the Multilateral Convention there is no confirmed active bilateral CRS exchange with major economies; activation status should be checked against the OECD portal directly.

Domestically, the Banking Act and the Counter-Terrorism Act allow the freezing, seizing, and detaining of terrorist assets, with authority resting mainly in the RMI Attorney General. These powers sit alongside the confidentiality regime and can override it where they apply.

European listing history matters for how banks classify the jurisdiction. It was returned to the EU blacklist in February 2023 over zero-tax treatment without real activity and weak substance enforcement, then removed in October 2023 after demonstrating cooperation.

As of the EU revision in February 2026, the Marshall Islands does not appear on the blacklist. Membership of the Asia/Pacific Group on Money Laundering keeps its AML/CFT framework under periodic FATF-style review.

Setup is administratively lean: no minimum capital, no local directors, and no public ownership disclosure. Once documents are submitted and approved, incorporation generally completes within one to three business days, with expedited options sometimes available.

US owners carry reporting duties that the registry's privacy does nothing to remove. FBAR (FinCEN 114) applies to foreign accounts above USD 10,000, Form 5471 applies to officers, directors, and shareholders of foreign corporations, and PFIC rules may bite where the entity holds investment assets.

The Compact of Free Association with the United States produces FATCA dynamics absent from most offshore centres, leaving RMI financial institutions effectively FATCA-compliant with IRS reporting for US persons. For non-US owners, the absence of CRS exchange is the more relevant feature.

A few operational points deserve attention:

  • Legacy EU greylist and blacklist designations can still colour bank risk classifications, even though the listings have been resolved.
  • Economic Substance Regulations have applied since 2018; confirm whether your entity's activities trigger substance obligations.
  • Correspondent banking remains a real constraint, with onboarding at international banks reported at four to twelve weeks.

Non-resident entities face no restriction on doing business outside the jurisdiction, except where activities such as banking, insurance, or trust services require separate licensing.

A Marshall Islands non-resident entity offers genuine confidentiality from the public record: owners, directors, and financial details stay off the searchable register, and nominee arrangements add a further layer where wanted. That privacy is real but not absolute, since court orders, the bilateral FATCA channel, and AML enforcement powers can compel disclosure to competent authorities. For US persons in particular, domestic reporting obligations continue regardless of what the registry shows. Treat the regime as strong public-facing privacy paired with defined, lawful access points, and plan banking and substance accordingly.

Expanship supports foreign owners in structuring a Marshall Islands entity so that confidentiality is set up correctly from formation, including registered-agent filings, nominee documentation where appropriate, and the records financial institutions will ask for, and we manage the wider lifecycle of a non-resident company alongside it.

  • Company incorporation as a Non-Resident Domestic Entity or LLC
  • Registered agent and registered office provision
  • Tax registration and filing support
  • Ongoing compliance and economic substance management
  • Accounting and bookkeeping aligned to your reporting needs
  • Introductions to correspondent and international banking partners

To discuss your structure and confirm what your entity requires, contact Expanship Marshall Islands.

No. The jurisdiction runs a closed registry where shareholders, directors, and beneficial owners are not disclosed publicly, and their names do not appear on incorporation documents. Ownership information is held only by the registered agent and shared with banks during account opening.

A Company Search Report shows the full legal name, registration number, incorporation date, current standing, and the registered agent and office addresses. Directors and shareholders are not included unless the company has voluntarily filed them.

For most jurisdictions, no, because the country has not signed the OECD Common Reporting Standard or the Multilateral Convention, so there is no automatic exchange with EU states, the UK, or other CRS signatories. The exception is the United States: a bilateral FATCA agreement effective 2017 means US persons are reported to the IRS through RMI financial institutions.

Yes. RMI law permits professional nominees for both roles, with the beneficial owner keeping control through private agreement, and a Declaration of Trust is standard where a nominee shareholder is used. These documents are held privately by the registered agent and are not filed with the Registrar.

There is no standalone domestic data-protection statute and no dedicated data protection authority. TCMI and IRI voluntarily treat themselves as data controllers under the EU GDPR and publish a privacy policy on that basis, but this is a contractual standard rather than RMI legislation.

Yes, in defined circumstances. Under the registrar's privacy policy, data may be released when compelled by a subpoena, court order, or similar process, or where required for national security, law enforcement, or prevention of financial loss, and domestic statutes give the Attorney General powers to freeze and seize terrorist assets.