Listen to this article
0:00 / 0:00

Key Takeaways

  • The Marshall Islands does not impose a recurring annual real property tax, a position rooted in customary land tenure and a lease-only system.
  • Foreign investors hold real property through leases rather than ownership, so costs centre on lease fees, local levies, and other land-related charges.
  • Despite the absence of property tax, practical holding costs still apply and warrant careful budgeting before acquiring rights to land.
  • Comparisons with regional jurisdictions and the current outlook suggest no recurring property tax is presently in place for non-resident holders.

There is no property tax in the Marshall Islands. The Republic levies no recurring annual charge on the ownership, occupation, or assessed value of real property, a position consistent with its wider profile as a zero-taxation offshore jurisdiction. The tax framework rests on three pillars: a Gross Revenue Tax, import duties, and a wages and salaries tax, none of which includes a property component.

This article explains why a recurrent real property levy does not exist, what charges a foreign owner might still encounter when leasing or transferring land, and how the position compares with neighbouring Pacific economies. It is most relevant to foreign investors, developers, and their advisers weighing whether to hold real assets or operate a leased site through a Marshallese entity. For an investor-facing overview of the legal and tax framework, the U.S. Department of State publishes an annual investment review.

No annual property tax applies. Independent tax-status surveys uniformly record the same result: property tax, no; transfer tax, no; inheritance tax, no; net worth tax, no.

The personal income tax rate on foreign-sourced income is zero, and the capital gains rate is also zero. The only business-level tax of general application is the Gross Revenue Tax.

Because no enabling statute exists, there is no rate to quote, no taxable value to assess, and no filing deadline to meet. Where most jurisdictions publish a property tax schedule, the Marshallese position is simply silence: nothing is levied, so nothing is owed.

The short answer

Owning or controlling real property in the Marshall Islands carries no recurring annual tax. The costs that arise are lease-related and transactional, not ad valorem.

Marshall Is.

Company Incorporation in Marshall Islands

Set up your company in Marshall Islands with Expanship handling registration end to end.

The statutory tax base contains no property tax measure. The Gross Revenue Tax, import duties, and the wages tax exhaust the recurring levies imposed on businesses and individuals, and the legislature has not enacted any assessed-value charge on land or buildings.

The deeper reason is constitutional. Land ownership is treated as fundamentally communal, with control held through clans and traditional title rather than individual freehold, a structure incompatible with the per-parcel valuation that ad valorem taxation requires.

Land cannot be sold, only leased. That single feature sets property tenure here apart from the freehold systems on which most property tax regimes are built.

The Foreign Investment Act of 1988 restricts the acquisition of land by foreign nationals, reinforcing the lease-only model. Property transactions are registered with the Office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court, and stamp duty may apply to transfers, but no recurrent annual charge is prescribed anywhere in the code.

Verifying the statute

Section-level citations for the full schedule of national taxes sit within the Marshall Islands Revised Code. Confirm specific provisions through the RMI Courts legislative database before relying on them.

Land rights flow through family lineage and social class rather than registered title. A single parcel is typically held simultaneously by three classes of right-holder: the Paramount Chief (Iroij), the clan elder (alap), and the worker who lives on the land (dri-jerbal).

All land is privately held by Marshallese citizens through these lineages. There is no pool of state-owned land available for freehold sale, and investors cannot purchase land at all; access comes only through customary leasing.

A Land Registration Authority was established in 2003 to create a voluntary register of customary land and a framework for recording ownership documents. Take-up remains partial, and written titles are limited, though residents on a given atoll usually know who controls each parcel.

Because rights are customary, frequently unwritten, and unrecorded, there is no cadastre on which assessments could be based. The scale of the practical obstacle is visible in the World Bank's Doing Business 2020 report, which ranked the Marshall Islands 187th of 190 economies for registering property.

A valuation system needs measurable parcels and identifiable single owners. Neither condition holds here, which is why a property tax has no foundation to stand on.

Marshall Is.

Ongoing Compliance in Marshall Islands

Keep your Marshall Islands entity compliant with filings, returns, and statutory obligations.

Foreign investors cannot own land outright. The route to real property is a long-term lease, commonly running 25 to 50 years with renewal options, negotiated directly with the customary right-holders.

For offshore companies the absence of property tax is one part of a wider pattern. Such entities are not taxed on income, profits, dividends, interest, royalties, or capital gains, so holding income-producing property through a corporate vehicle attracts no additional layer of property-based tax.

Several incentives sit alongside this position:

  • An Investor Permit requires a minimum USD 50,000 investment in approved sectors and grants two-year renewable status with business operation rights.
  • Investments of at least USD 1 million, or those generating wages above USD 150,000 annually for Marshallese citizens, can secure a five-year exemption from Gross Revenue Tax and import duties in certain sectors.
  • All non-citizen investors must first obtain a Foreign Investment Business License.

Capital moves freely. There are no restrictions on the repatriation of profits, dividends, or invested capital, and the currency is the U.S. dollar.

One financing point deserves attention. Mortgages against land title are not permitted, but commercial lease agreements and lease payments can serve as collateral, which shapes how a leveraged project must be structured.

The absence of a recurring levy does not mean property is cost-free. Several transactional and operational charges touch real estate, and a foreign owner should budget for them.

Land-related charges a foreign owner may encounter
Charge Trigger Basis
Stamp duty Sales, transfers, and leases Value or consideration in the document
Lease fees Leasing or developing customary land Negotiated; varies with size and use
Local sales tax Local authority jurisdictions 2% to 4%
Gross Revenue Tax Business income earned on the leased site Entity-level turnover tax

Stamp duty attaches to a range of legal documents, property transfers and leases among them, and is generally calculated on the value or consideration involved. Lease and rental income are themselves taxable, and a business operating from leased land remains within the Gross Revenue Tax in the ordinary way.

Specific stamp duty rates and thresholds are not published in a consolidated public schedule. Confirm them through the Ministry of Finance or local counsel before committing to a transaction.

Marshall Is.

Marshall Islands Incorporation Pricing

See transparent pricing to incorporate and maintain a company in Marshall Islands.

Holding costs are driven by geography, not taxation. Every building material must be imported, which pushes construction expense well above regional norms; a small guesthouse development is estimated at USD 100,000 to USD 300,000 or more.

Lease terms scale with project ambition. Standard investor leases run 25 to 50 years, while master development leases for large resort or commercial schemes can extend to 99 years where the government facilitates the arrangement.

The benchmark for long-term tenure is the Kwajalein lease to the U.S. Government, which runs 50 years to 2066 with a 20-year renewal option. Arrangements of that scale set the upper bound on what is achievable.

On the return side, rental yields in Majuro range from 6% to 10%, depending on location and condition, and centrally located properties tend to hold high occupancy given the shortage of modern housing. Because no withholding tax is levied on dividends, interest, or royalties, income extracted from a property-holding structure faces no additional friction at distribution.

One contractual risk stands out. The investor is responsible for ensuring every customary right-holder is party to the lease; omitting a landowner can lead to litigation that disrupts the project.

Confirm every right-holder

A parcel may have three or more simultaneous owners under customary tenure. A lease that fails to include all of them is vulnerable to challenge in court.

No annual property tax applies across several Pacific economies, but the surrounding tax structures differ in important ways. The Marshall Islands stands at the lighter end: no property tax, no capital gains tax, no personal or corporate income tax, with only a Gross Revenue Tax at the entity level.

That entity-level charge applies at 0.8% on taxable income up to USD 10,000 and 3% above that figure for resident companies; non-residents face a 10% withholding rate on services income sourced in the Republic.

Selected Pacific jurisdictions compared
Jurisdiction Annual property tax Headline business / consumption tax
Marshall Islands No Gross Revenue Tax (0.8% / 3%)
Palau No 10% PGST + 12% Business Profits Tax (from 1 January 2023)
Vanuatu No VAT 15%; no income tax
FSM No general charge More progressive corporate structure

Palau retired its turnover tax in favour of a Goods and Services Tax and a profits tax, giving it a more developed base than the Marshall Islands while keeping property untaxed. Vanuatu raised its VAT to 15% and levies no income tax, making it the closest zero-income-tax comparator in the region.

The Federated States of Micronesia has moved toward a more progressive corporate structure, a more conventional tax base than its neighbour to the north. The IMF has named the Marshall Islands among the jurisdictions that should consider adopting a VAT, an observation that signals how thin the existing tax base is by regional standards.

A property tax is a remote prospect. The reform programme set out in the IMF's 2025 technical assistance work runs in two phases, and neither contains a property measure.

Phase 1, revising the personal income tax, was legislated in October 2024. Phase 2 introduces a consumption tax, the Marshall Islands Consumption Tax, alongside a Business Profits Tax, and is foreseen for October 2026.

The proposed consumption tax carries a 10% rate and applies only to businesses with annual turnover above USD 100,000. The direction of travel is plainly toward consumption and profits, not land.

Fiscal pressure exists. Tax revenues amount to roughly 15% of GDP, with the budget heavily supported by grants, yet the renewed Compact of Free Association signed in 2023 and effective in 2024 guarantees USD 2.3 billion over twenty years through 2043, easing the urgency that might otherwise push toward a new tax base.

Politics and practicality reinforce the point. Government has expropriated land on only one occasion, and only temporarily; given the weight of customary ownership, a state-administered assessment system would be politically difficult. Without a cadastre or reliable written titles, the machinery a property tax requires does not exist.

Taken together, constitutional communal tenure, the absent cadastre, Compact funding, and a reform agenda fixed on consumption and profits make a recurring property tax unlikely through at least 2030.

For a non-resident business owner, the absence of a recurring property tax is less a hidden advantage than a structural fact that flows directly from how land rights work in the Marshall Islands: because freehold ownership is not available to foreign investors, a tax on owned property simply has no basis to exist. The decision-relevant question, then, is not whether a property tax bill will arrive, but whether the lease fees and local levies that replace it fit the financial model being planned.

That reframing is what should drive the next step. Before treating the no-property-tax position as a cost saving, a prospective investor should obtain a clear accounting of all lease-related and land-related charges specific to the site and local authority in question, since those figures, not the absence of a tax line, will determine the true holding cost.

Expanship supports foreign-owned entities holding or leasing real property in the Marshall Islands by confirming the tax position in writing, handling stamp duty and lease registration steps, and structuring the entity that holds the asset, then extends that support across the full lifecycle of a Marshallese company.

  • Company incorporation and structuring for foreign owners
  • Registered agent and registered office services
  • Tax registration and Gross Revenue Tax filing
  • Ongoing compliance and annual maintenance
  • Accounting and bookkeeping
  • Introductions to banking partners

To discuss a property holding or company structure, contact Expanship Marshall Islands.

No. There is no recurring annual property tax, transfer tax, inheritance tax, or net worth tax. Property owners and lessees face no assessed-value levy on land or buildings.

No. Land cannot be sold and foreign nationals cannot acquire freehold title; access comes through long-term leases, typically 25 to 50 years with renewal options, negotiated with customary right-holders. All non-citizen investors must also obtain a Foreign Investment Business License.

Yes, though none is a recurring property tax. Stamp duty may apply to sales, transfers, and leases, generally calculated on the value or consideration involved, and lease or rental income is taxable; local authorities also levy a sales tax of 2% to 4%.

Land is held communally under customary tenure, with single parcels often owned by three or more right-holders, and land cannot be sold, only leased. The absence of individual freehold title and of a working cadastre leaves no basis for assessed-value taxation.

It is unlikely. The reform agenda foreseen for October 2026 introduces a consumption tax and a business profits tax, with no property component, and Compact funding through 2043 reduces the fiscal pressure that might drive one.

Rental income is taxable, and a business operating from leased land remains within the Gross Revenue Tax. No withholding tax applies to dividends, interest, or royalties, so income extracted through a corporate holding structure faces no additional charge at distribution.