Bermuda FATF Ratings and AML/CFT Framework Explained

FATF and Bermuda: Why a Global Standard-Setter Matters to Foreign OwnersCopy link to section

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) sets the global benchmark for anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing, and FATF in Bermuda is best understood through one fact: the jurisdiction is not on the grey or black list, and its compliance scores rank among the strongest measured anywhere. Assessment runs through the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force (CFATF), the regional body that conducted Bermuda's most recent mutual evaluation, with FATF overseeing quality and consistency.

This matters to any foreign business owner, investor, or adviser weighing a Bermuda structure, because a jurisdiction's FATF standing shapes banking access, counterparty due diligence, and the documentation an entity must produce. The sections below explain what FATF is, how Bermuda has been rated, who enforces the rules locally, and what those ratings mean for non-resident clients in practice. It is most relevant to those whose ownership, funding, or transaction flows cross multiple jurisdictions.

What the Financial Action Task Force Is and How It OperatesCopy link to section

FATF is an intergovernmental body created by the G7 in 1989 to set standards against money laundering, terrorist financing, and related financial crime. Its membership numbers 39: 37 countries plus the United Nations and the World Bank.

The body does not enforce law directly. Instead, it issues guidance, evaluates national compliance, and publishes two lists that carry real economic weight.

• The grey list names jurisdictions under increased monitoring for strategic AML/CFT deficiencies.
• The black list names high-risk jurisdictions with serious deficiencies and non-cooperative conduct.

These lists are revised three times a year, usually following FATF plenary meetings. Compliance itself is measured through mutual evaluations: peer reviews carried out by experts from other member states alongside the FATF Secretariat.

Regional affiliates extend this reach across the world. The Caribbean Financial Action Task Force is one such body, and it is the assessor responsible for Bermuda.

Company Incorporation in Bermuda

Set up your company in Bermuda with Expanship handling registration end to end.

Learn more

The 40 Recommendations and Bermuda's Commitment to ThemCopy link to section

The 40 Recommendations are the international standard countries are expected to implement against money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing. First issued in 1990, they were revised in 1996, 2001, 2003, and most recently in 2012, when nine earlier Special Recommendations on terrorist financing were folded into a single consolidated set.

Each Recommendation is accompanied by Interpretive Notes, and eleven Immediate Outcomes are used to judge how well a system works in practice. The framework divides into seven distinct areas of obligation.

Bermuda's record against this standard is unusually strong. Of the more than 75 mutual evaluation reports FATF has published, the jurisdiction holds the highest technical compliance result of any assessed, with 39 of the 40 Recommendations rated Compliant or Largely Compliant.

That alignment is not aspirational; it is written into local law. The Proceeds of Crime (AML/ATF) Regulations 2008 require enhanced due diligence for any country FATF or CFATF identifies as high-risk, so the international standard reaches regulated businesses as a binding obligation.

Bermuda's Mutual Evaluation History Under the Caribbean Financial Action Task ForceCopy link to section

Two full evaluation cycles tell the story. The first, conducted under the 2004 FATF Methodology, saw an on-site visit between 7 and 23 May 2007.

That earlier assessment was modest. The country was rated compliant with 9 Recommendations, largely compliant with 10, partially compliant with 16, and non-compliant with 14, and it was placed in regular follow-up in November 2007.

The picture changed over the following years. After addressing the identified deficiencies, the jurisdiction exited follow-up in November 2013.

The most recent evaluation, the 4th Round, involved an on-site visit from 24 September to 5 October 2018. Assessors interviewed officials across the full national architecture, including the Bermuda Police Service, Customs, the Financial Intelligence Agency, the Attorney General's Chambers, the Department of Public Prosecutions, the Bermuda Casino and Gaming Commission, the Bermuda Monetary Authority, the Registrar of Companies, the Registrar General, and the Barristers and Accountants AML/ATF Board.

The 4th-Round report was approved by the CFATF plenary in November 2019, submitted to FATF for post-plenary review, and formally published in January 2020. On overall effectiveness, the result places the jurisdiction in the top six of all reports issued under the updated methodology.

Ongoing Compliance in Bermuda

Keep your Bermuda entity compliant with filings, returns, and statutory obligations.

Learn more

Technical Compliance Ratings Across Bermuda's AML/CFT FrameworkCopy link to section

Technical compliance measures how fully a country has implemented the wording and structure of the Recommendations, scored on a four-point scale from Compliant down to Non-Compliant. On this measure the January 2020 result is the leading outcome among all evaluated jurisdictions.

The consolidated ratings table records a clear pattern: most Recommendations rated Compliant, a small number Largely Compliant, and a single Recommendation Partially Compliant. The jurisdiction is only the second ever assessed as having a high level of effectiveness in risk assessment and domestic coordination.

Effectiveness Ratings: How Bermuda Performed on the Immediate OutcomesCopy link to section

Effectiveness is judged separately from technical compliance, against eleven Immediate Outcomes scored from High down to Low. These outcomes test whether a system delivers results, not merely whether the rules exist on paper.

The standout is IO1, the only High rating, covering risk assessment and domestic coordination. Substantial ratings span international cooperation, supervision, beneficial ownership oversight, and the use of financial intelligence.

The weakest result is IO8, rated Low, concerning the confiscation of criminal proceeds. This is the area the report flags as having the most scope for improvement, and the full qualitative reasoning sits in the published report.

Bermuda Incorporation Pricing

See transparent pricing to incorporate and maintain a company in Bermuda.

View pricing

The Bermuda Monetary Authority and the National AML/CFT ArchitectureCopy link to section

No single body carries sole responsibility for combating financial crime; the work is shared across several agencies. The Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA) regulates financial services, handling licensing and supervision of the institutions that matter most to foreign-owned structures.

Supervisory duties are split by sector. The Registrar of Companies oversees dealers in high-value goods, the Superintendent of Real Estate covers brokers and agents, and the Barristers and Accountants AML/ATF Board supervises regulated law and accountancy firms.

Two other bodies anchor the system. The Financial Intelligence Agency, created under the Financial Intelligence Agency Act 2007, receives and analyses Suspicious Activity Reports, while the National Anti-Money Laundering Committee (NAMLC) coordinates policy and legislative development.

The legal foundations are layered. Money laundering was first criminalised in the Proceeds of Crime Act 1997, terrorist financing obligations arrived with the Anti-Terrorism (Financial and Other Measures) Act 2004, and the detailed compliance duties took effect under the Proceeds of Crime Regulations that superseded earlier rules on 1 January 2009.

Guidance keeps the framework current. The BMA issues AML/ATF Guidance Notes for regulated financial institutions, with revisions from the August 2022 cycle incorporated on 15 February 2023.

Follow-Up Reporting and Bermuda's Path Through Re-RatingsCopy link to section

The 3rd-Round cycle shows how re-rating works. Follow-up reports presented at CFATF plenary meetings tracked the corrective actions taken after the 2007 evaluation, leading to deficiencies in Core and Key Recommendations being addressed and a 5th Follow-Up Report delivered at the May 2014 plenary.

The 4th-Round position is different. The consolidated ratings table carries the entry "MER · Jan-20 · CFATF" with no follow-up code appended, which indicates that no formal re-rating report has yet been published under the current round.

• Advisers should confirm directly with CFATF (cfatf-gafic.org) whether any 4th-Round follow-up submission or re-rating has been issued since early 2020.

Between formal cycles, the framework stays active. On 2 December 2024 the Ministry of Justice issued AML-ATF Ministerial Advisory 3/2024, reinforcing vigilance against risks in specific jurisdictions.

What FATF Alignment Means in Practice for Non-Resident Owners and AdvisersCopy link to section

The operative fact for a foreign owner is straightforward: the jurisdiction sits on neither the grey list nor the black list. For comparison, the British Virgin Islands and Bolivia were grey-listed as of 13 June 2025, which subjects connected businesses to heightened scrutiny; Bermuda's absence from that list spares its entities the same treatment.

That said, FATF standards still bind regulated providers, and those obligations flow straight to non-resident clients. Customer due diligence, record keeping, systems, and staff training requirements under the 2008 Regulations apply to regulated financial institutions, professional firms, casinos, dealers in high-value goods, and real estate agents acting in or from the jurisdiction.

Two practical consequences follow for a foreign owner:

• Enhanced due diligence applies where ownership, funding, or transactions touch a FATF-listed jurisdiction, so structures with such links face deeper checks at the entity level.
• Fitness and propriety vetting of directors, shareholders, and ultimate beneficial owners forms part of BMA registration and licensing, and non-resident principals must pass it.

The vetting regime is deliberately strict, designed to keep individuals seeking to misuse corporate structures off the island. Requests for KYC and beneficial ownership documentation are mandated by law, not a matter of provider discretion, so expect to supply identity, source-of-funds, and ownership evidence as a condition of incorporation and account opening.

Outlook for Bermuda's Standing With FATFCopy link to section

The current status is clean: no grey or black listing as of the most recent plenary cycle in June 2025. Behind that sits the strongest technical compliance score of any assessed jurisdiction and a top-six placement for overall effectiveness, which positions the jurisdiction well ahead of any future review.

A 5th-Round evaluation is expected but not yet scheduled. FATF began its 5th round in 2024 under the revised 2022 Methodology, and regional bodies including CFATF will start their next cycles as they complete the current one.

Maintenance between cycles is visible. Guidance Note revisions took effect in February 2023, a Ministerial Advisory followed in December 2024, and NAMLC continues to drive legislative development, giving the framework institutional continuity. No on-site date for the next CFATF evaluation has been published, so advisers should monitor the CFATF website for scheduling.

ConclusionCopy link to section

For a non-resident owner, the headline is reassuring: a jurisdiction off both FATF lists, with compliance ratings at the top of the global range, and a regulator that applies standards consistently. The practical trade-off is that strong standing comes with real documentation duties, so expect rigorous KYC, beneficial ownership disclosure, and fitness vetting as the price of access. Where your structure connects to a listed jurisdiction, plan for enhanced due diligence rather than treating it as an obstacle. Sound preparation of ownership and source-of-funds evidence will carry most of the compliance burden.

How Expanship Can Help Your Business in BermudaCopy link to section

Expanship supports foreign owners through the FATF-driven compliance steps that matter at incorporation and beyond, from assembling beneficial ownership and source-of-funds documentation to preparing principals for BMA fitness and propriety vetting. The same team handles the wider needs of a foreign-owned entity across the jurisdiction.

• Company formation and structuring for non-resident owners
• Registered agent and registered office services
• Tax registration and filing support
• Ongoing compliance and regulatory management
• Accounting and bookkeeping
• Introductions to banking partners

To discuss your structure and compliance position, contact Expanship Bermuda.

Frequently Asked QuestionsCopy link to section