Listen to this article
0:00 / 17:24

Key Takeaways

  • Vanuatu has moved away from freely transferable bearer shares, replacing them with custody-based immobilisation or conversion to registered shares.
  • Legacy bearer instruments are subject to transition rules that require conversion to registered form or compliance with immobilisation and custody requirements.
  • Beneficial ownership and transparency obligations now apply to any surviving instruments, reducing the confidentiality bearer shares once offered offshore owners.
  • Non-resident owners and advisers should review existing structures against the current statutory position under the International Companies Act and the Companies Act.

Bearer shares in Vanuatu were abolished in 2016, and no new bearer instruments may be issued by an International Company registered there. The reform aligned the jurisdiction with global transparency standards and is administered through the framework set out in the International Companies Act [Cap. 222], overseen by the Vanuatu Financial Services Commission (VFSC), whose consolidated statute is published on its own portal.

This change directly affects foreign owners who once relied on bearer instruments for ownership anonymity and anyone now weighing a Vanuatu structure on that basis. The article traces how the position developed, what survives for legacy certificates, and what the abolition means for privacy and beneficial ownership going forward.

It is most relevant to non-resident investors, company founders, and the advisers who structure cross-border holdings.

A bearer share is an equity instrument whose owner is whoever physically holds the certificate. No name appears in any company register, and title passes simply by handing the paper to another person.

For offshore owners, that mechanic once delivered near-total anonymity: no KYC at the point of transfer, no register entry, and no traceable chain of ownership. The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) flagged this same feature as a way to hide the true owners of legal persons, marking bearer shares as a recognised financial crime risk.

Vanuatu built an accessible offshore regime around the International Companies Act, enacted in 1993, which governs International Companies (ICs) formed for cross-border commercial activity. Bearer instruments carried real commercial weight in that system because an IC is exempt from local tax and faces no mandatory filing or audit duties unless it trades inside the country.

Company Incorporation in Vanuatu

Set up your company in Vanuatu with Expanship handling registration end to end.

Under the original 1993 Act, shares could be issued in registered or bearer form, and a company could convert freely between the two. Two parallel tracks of company law operated side by side: the domestic Companies Act [Cap. 191] and the offshore International Companies Act [Cap. 222].

Before 2015, the offshore regime added an immobilisation requirement for bearer shares. That measure had clear weaknesses: it carried no supervisory mechanism to confirm compliance, it did not reach bearer share warrants, and the regulator held no figures on how many bearer shares or warrants Vanuatu companies had issued.

The Asia/Pacific Group on Money Laundering (APG) examined the jurisdiction in a Mutual Evaluation published in 2015, which identified significant shortcomings in transparency and enforcement. Bearer shares were expressly abolished the following year, in 2016.

Domestic companies, meanwhile, fall under the Companies Act No. 28 of 2012, which governs formation, management, and dissolution for entities operating locally.

The governing offshore statute remains the International Companies Act [Cap. 222], administered by the VFSC, with the domestic sphere covered by the Companies Act No. 28 of 2012. Bearer shares are no longer permitted under the corporate framework.

You may encounter secondary commercial sources stating that bearer shares are "still available" under the Act. That claim conflicts with the 2016 abolition confirmed elsewhere and should be checked against the current consolidated text rather than relied upon.

Verify before you rely

The VFSC-hosted version of the Act appears to retain legacy transitional language referring to bearer shares, and the precise operative section for the abolition was not extractable from the published text. A qualified Vanuatu lawyer should confirm the exact provision before any decision rests on it.

An International Company may carry on international business but cannot own real estate locally beyond leasing an office, and it may not hold banking, trust, or insurance licences without separate authorisation.

Ongoing Compliance in Vanuatu

Keep your Vanuatu entity compliant with filings, returns, and statutory obligations.

The reform moved through two visible phases. Before 2016, the immobilisation model required bearer shares to be held by a custodian, but enforcement was absent and warrants sat outside the rule entirely; in 2016, the instrument was abolished outright, ending new issuance.

The external driver was FATF Recommendation 24. Revisions adopted in March 2022 require member countries to prohibit new bearer shares and bearer share warrants, and to convert or immobilise any that remain.

By acting in 2016, the jurisdiction moved ahead of that 2022 tightening, a sequence that points to its response to the 2015 APG findings. Public records retrieved do not confirm whether a formal custodian-licensing scheme operated between the initial immobilisation requirement and the abolition.

Because no new bearer shares may be issued after 2016, the question of custody now applies only to pre-2016 legacy certificates. Where such instruments survive, the expectation aligned with FATF standards is that they be immobilised with a licensed custodian who records beneficial ownership, or otherwise restricted.

Registered agents are obliged to maintain beneficial ownership records, and authorities can reach those records through proper legal process. Several practical specifics remain unclear in public sources, including the prescribed custodian class, the regulation number setting custody rules, penalties for non-compliant holding, and any fee schedule.

At the time of the 2015 APG evaluation, the regulator did not know the total number of bearer shares or warrants in issue, so no verified count of outstanding legacy instruments exists in the retrieved record. To establish what applies to a specific certificate, approach the VFSC or a licensed registered agent directly.

Vanuatu Incorporation Pricing

See transparent pricing to incorporate and maintain a company in Vanuatu.

The precise statutory deadline, grace period, and conversion mechanism for pre-2016 certificates were not found in retrieved sources, which is a material gap. Some secondary commentary describes bearer shares as "largely phased out," wording that hints at unextinguished legacy instruments without confirming any official cut-off.

Under the original regime, conversion was permitted in both directions, so the mechanics of moving bearer holdings to registered form would follow the same path; whether a binding conversion deadline was legislated is unconfirmed. As a general principle, jurisdictions abolishing bearer shares typically required holders to surrender or convert certificates within a set window, after which the attached rights were suspended or extinguished. Confirm the Vanuatu provision with the regulator or against the primary legislation before assuming any outcome.

Beneficial ownership data in Vanuatu is collected by regulators but is not open to the public. Privacy from the general public is therefore strong, while privacy from government authorities acting through proper legal process is limited.

Foreign tax authorities can obtain information through the Common Reporting Standard, FATCA, or tax information exchange agreements, and law enforcement can do so via mutual legal assistance treaties. The jurisdiction adopted CRS and implemented FATCA agreements across 2017 to 2018, strengthening its AML/CFT framework in the process.

The 2015 APG evaluation had described ownership information on international companies as extremely hard to obtain, with criminal-penalty secrecy provisions actively impeding competent-authority access. The reforms that followed, together with the March 2022 revision of FATF Recommendation 24 requiring accurate and current ownership data, set the direction away from that earlier position. The relevant body for ongoing AML/CFT assessment is the APG.

Any structure marketed as offering newly issued Vanuatu bearer shares is non-compliant with current law. Treat such an offer as a warning sign about the provider rather than a genuine privacy feature.

To form an International Company, you must engage a licensed registered agent, who will collect KYC documentation such as passport, proof of address, and source of funds before filing with the VFSC. The company must keep records of its directors and shareholders, though those details are not placed on the public file.

Indicative cost of a Vanuatu International Company
Item Amount (USD)
Annual government renewal (each 30 June) 300
Government fee in year of incorporation 150
Total first-year formation (lean structure) 1,200 to 1,700
Of which government fees approx. 450 to 550
Of which registered agent services approx. 600 to 900

Where bearer shares underpinned a legacy structure, confirm with a licensed agent whether immobilisation arrangements exist and what recordkeeping now applies. Ownership confidentiality rests on the non-public register, registered-agent obligations, and nominee shareholders and directors, which remain permitted within the AML and KYC framework, rather than on anonymous paper.

Bearer shares as a working privacy tool are permanently closed. The 2016 abolition sits ahead of the 2022 revision of FATF Recommendation 24, so the jurisdiction already meets the prohibition-and-conversion standard that other regimes are still adapting to.

The wider trend points consistently toward transparency: CRS adoption, FATCA implementation, and continuing APG evaluation pressure all move away from instrument-level anonymity. A complete abolition is generally viewed more favourably under FATF Round 5 evaluations than an immobilisation-only approach, which leaves the jurisdiction in a defensible position on this point.

What remains is genuine tax exemption for international business and meaningful privacy from the public register, not secrecy. No scheduled next evaluation date or pending amendment to the Act on bearer shares was found in public sources.

Bearer shares no longer offer a route to anonymous ownership in Vanuatu, and any offer suggesting otherwise should be treated with caution. The residual privacy that exists comes from a non-public register, registered-agent confidentiality, and lawful nominee arrangements, all of which sit inside an AML framework that gives regulators and foreign tax authorities lawful access. If a legacy certificate is part of your structure, settle its status with a licensed agent before relying on it. For new formations, plan around registered shares and proper KYC from the outset.

Expanship helps foreign owners assess where bearer instruments leave a legacy structure, coordinate with licensed registered agents on the status of older certificates, and set up compliant registered-share arrangements that meet current beneficial ownership rules. The same team supports the wider needs of a foreign-owned International Company across its life cycle.

  • Company incorporation and structuring for International Companies
  • Licensed registered agent and registered office services
  • Tax registration and filing where obligations arise
  • Ongoing compliance and annual renewal management
  • Accounting and bookkeeping for cross-border entities
  • Introductions to banking partners

To discuss your structure, contact Expanship Vanuatu.

No. Bearer shares were abolished in 2016, and no International Company may issue new bearer instruments, so any provider claiming otherwise is operating outside current law.

Pre-2016 certificates are the only category for which custody questions remain, and surviving instruments are expected to be immobilised with a licensed custodian who records beneficial ownership. The exact conversion deadline and mechanism were not found in public sources, so confirm the position with the VFSC or a licensed registered agent before relying on any legacy certificate.

No. Regulators collect ownership data, but it is not disclosed to the general public; foreign tax authorities and law enforcement can access it through CRS, FATCA, tax information exchange, or mutual legal assistance.

Privacy from the public register remains available through registered-share structures and lawful nominee shareholders and directors, which are still permitted. Privacy from regulators and foreign tax authorities acting under proper legal process is not, given the jurisdiction's CRS and FATCA commitments since 2017 to 2018.

The annual government renewal fee is USD 300, due each 30 June, with USD 150 payable in the year of incorporation. A lean first-year formation, combining government and registered agent fees, typically falls between USD 1,200 and 1,700.

The 2016 abolition followed the 2015 APG Mutual Evaluation, which identified weak transparency and enforcement around bearer instruments. It also moved the jurisdiction ahead of the March 2022 revision of FATF Recommendation 24, which requires countries to prohibit new bearer shares and convert or immobilise existing ones.