Key Takeaways
- Different watchdogs maintain separate lists, so the Isle of Man's standing on the EU, FATF and OECD assessments must be checked individually.
- Being listed or unlisted shapes how banks and counterparties run due diligence and how the jurisdiction is perceived by non-resident owners.
- Past listings, delistings and stated commitments form a track record that helps explain the Isle of Man's current position and likely direction.
- Action plans and transparency outcomes show whether removal applies and how listing status may evolve for those operating from the Isle of Man.
The Isle of Man's Standing on International Grey and Black Lists: An At-a-Glance Position
The Isle of Man does not appear on any active grey or black list maintained by the European Union or the Financial Action Task Force. It sits outside both EU Annex I and Annex II, and FATF places it on neither its list of jurisdictions under increased monitoring nor its high-risk list, a position confirmed on the EU Council register and through FATF-style monitoring by MONEYVAL.
This standing matters most to non-resident owners weighing where to incorporate, and to their advisers screening counterparties for tax and anti-money-laundering exposure. The sections below explain what the various lists are, where the Isle of Man falls on each, how it reached that position, and what the absence of a listing means in practice for banking, due diligence, and reporting.
Why Watchdogs Maintain These Lists and What "Listed" Actually Means for a Jurisdiction
International lists exist to drive change, not to publish a hall of shame. The EU's list of non-cooperative tax jurisdictions divides into two parts: Annex I, the blacklist proper, and Annex II, a "state of play" register for jurisdictions that have committed to reforms but have not yet completed them.
Blacklisting under Annex I carries concrete tax consequences for arrangements touching the listed country. These include higher withholding taxes, denial of deductions on certain payments, exposure under controlled-foreign-company rules, and restrictions on dividend participation exemptions.
The FATF lists work on a different axis, targeting anti-money-laundering and counter-terrorist-financing weakness rather than tax. Its grey list, formally "Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring", names countries with strategic deficiencies that are working through an agreed action plan; the black list is reserved for the highest-risk cases.
FATF issues these documents three times a year and holds no direct enforcement power of its own. The real-world bite comes from commercial banks and payment processors, which feed FATF status straight into their risk models and onboarding decisions.
The EU's screening criteria draw on standards set by the OECD, principally through the Global Forum on transparency, the Forum on Harmful Tax Practices, and the Inclusive Framework on BEPS. A country that meets those standards generally stays off both annexes.
Company Incorporation in Isle of Man
Set up your company in Isle of Man with Expanship handling registration end to end.
The EU Perspective: Annex I (Blacklist) and Annex II (Greylist) Status for the Isle of Man
The EU refreshed its list of non-cooperative tax jurisdictions on 17 February 2026, and the Isle of Man appears on neither annex. It is absent from the blacklist and from the greylist alike.
For reference, the following jurisdictions held a place on each annex at the most recent updates.
| List | Jurisdictions |
|---|---|
| Annex I (blacklist), 17 February 2026 | American Samoa, Anguilla, Guam, Palau, Panama, Russia, Turks and Caicos Islands, US Virgin Islands, Vanuatu, Viet Nam |
| Annex II (greylist), October 2025 ECOFIN | Antigua and Barbuda, Belize, British Virgin Islands, Brunei Darussalam, Eswatini, Greenland, Jordan, Montenegro, Morocco, Seychelles, Türkiye |
ECOFIN finance ministers reaffirmed on 12 March 2019 that the Isle of Man is a cooperative jurisdiction on tax good governance. The assessment work behind any listing decision falls to the EU Code of Conduct Group, which reviews adherence to global tax standards and recommends listing where it finds insufficient compliance or a harmful practice.
One downstream rule turns on greylist tenure: the EU Public Country-by-Country Reporting Directive imposes granular disclosure on Annex I jurisdictions and on those that have stayed on Annex II for at least two years. The Isle of Man triggers neither threshold.
The FATF View: Where the Isle of Man Sits on the Grey and Black Lists
FATF does not list the Isle of Man on either its grey list or its black list. The February 2026 grey list ran to 22 jurisdictions, none of them the Isle of Man, while the black list held only North Korea, Iran, and Myanmar.
Assessment of the island runs through MONEYVAL, the Council of Europe's FATF-style regional body based in Strasbourg, rather than through FATF directly. Its most recent full Mutual Evaluation Report followed an on-site visit between 25 April and 7 May 2016 and was published in December 2016, placing the jurisdiction into enhanced follow-up.
That evaluation rated the island positively on 39 of the 40 FATF Recommendations, a strong technical-compliance result. After the 61st MONEYVAL Plenary in April 2021, the reporting cadence eased: the Isle of Man no longer reports annually and instead reports every three years while remaining in enhanced follow-up.
The next milestone is set. MONEYVAL has confirmed that the on-site visit for the 6th Round Mutual Evaluation will take place in October 2026, with details available on the government's FATF and MONEYVAL page.
Ongoing Compliance in Isle of Man
Keep your Isle of Man entity compliant with filings, returns, and statutory obligations.
The OECD Assessment: Harmful Tax Practices, Transparency Ratings and Forum Outcomes
The Isle of Man joined the OECD Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes in 2009. Its Second Round peer review on exchange of information on request, completed in 2017, returned an overall rating of Compliant, the top band.
A 2025 enhanced monitoring report examined the 2023–2024 period and judged two legal-framework recommendations "provisionally addressed subject to detailed validation," issuing two new corresponding recommendations. Across that window the island received 246 information requests and sent 4, with full and final responses provided in 83% of incoming requests; the United Kingdom, Sweden, and France were its leading partners.
On harmful tax practices under BEPS Action 5, the Inclusive Framework agreed in November 2018 that economic substance requirements would apply to no or nominal-tax jurisdictions, and the island underwent a substance peer review in 2019. The Forum on Harmful Tax Practices, in its fifth annual monitoring of substance requirements dated November 2025, found most such jurisdictions fully compliant and singled out only Anguilla and Turks and Caicos Islands for focused monitoring.
Information-exchange machinery is well established here. The Isle of Man was an early adopter of the Common Reporting Standard, completing its first automatic exchanges in September 2017, and it reports US-person account data to the IRS through a FATCA intergovernmental agreement.
A further commitment is in train for digital assets. The island has signed up to the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework and the related CRS updates, with a first reporting period expected in 2026 and exchanges beginning in 2027.
Other National and Supranational Lists That May Reference the Isle of Man
IMF Financial Sector Assessment Program reviews of the island have noted high standards of regulation and supervision and strong AML/CFT compliance. Because the jurisdiction belongs to MONEYVAL rather than the EU, it is measured against the FATF 40 Recommendations and is not bound to transpose the EU Anti-Money Laundering Directives.
On the US side, the island operates a Model 1 FATCA agreement: local financial institutions report to the Isle of Man tax authority, which exchanges with the IRS, and no separate IRS blacklist applies. Beneficial ownership data sits in a central database maintained under the Beneficial Ownership Act 2017, a structure that supports bank onboarding worldwide.
No public evidence points to an individual EU member state operating a domestic blacklist that names the Isle of Man. As a general rule, member states reserve defensive tax measures for Annex I jurisdictions, and the island does not feature there.
Isle of Man Incorporation Pricing
See transparent pricing to incorporate and maintain a company in Isle of Man.
The Historical Record: Past Listings, Delistings and the Reasons Cited
The Isle of Man was removed from the EU greylist in 2019 after carrying out the reforms the Code of Conduct Group had sought. The decisive step was its Economic Substance Legislation, effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2019.
That legislation requires companies in geographically mobile sectors, such as banking, shipping, and intellectual property holding, to show genuine local activity. The earlier greylist placement had arisen not from a transparency failing, which the island had already addressed, but from EU substance concerns directed at offshore centres that lacked such rules before 2019.
The MONEYVAL track shows steady remediation rather than crisis. Follow-up reports re-rated the island upward on eight Recommendations in 2018, four more in 2019, and two more in 2020; its participation in MONEYVAL evaluations was authorised by Council of Europe Resolution CM/Res(2012)6 on 10 October 2012.
The Isle of Man has never appeared on the FATF blacklist at any point. No public record confirms a formal FATF grey-listing in its history either.
Commitments, Action Plans and the Path to Removal Where Applicable
There is no active EU or FATF list from which the Isle of Man needs to be removed, so the relevant question is one of maintaining standing rather than escaping a listing. Several commitments keep that standing intact.
- Continued effective implementation of the exchange-of-information standard, addressing the two recommendations from the 2025 Global Forum enhanced monitoring report.
- Ongoing reporting to MONEYVAL within the enhanced follow-up process, ahead of the 6th Round on-site visit in October 2026.
- Delivery of the island's 2024–2026 Financial Crime Strategy, an all-island approach to money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing.
- Sustained compliance with the BEPS Action 5 minimum standard on harmful tax practices.
A notable tax development reinforces the picture. In November 2024, Tynwald approved the Global Minimum Tax (Pillar Two) Order 2024, introducing a 15% Domestic Top-up Tax and a Multinational Top-up Tax effective for in-scope groups with fiscal years starting on or after 1 January 2025.
Practical Consequences for Non-Resident Owners: Due Diligence, Banking and Perception
For a foreign-owned entity, the headline is that the punitive measures tied to EU blacklisting simply do not attach to Isle of Man structures. Higher withholding taxes, non-deductibility of payments, CFC inclusion, and participation-exemption restrictions all key off Annex I status, which the island does not hold.
The same logic runs through the AML side. FATF-mandated enhanced due diligence applies to grey-listed counterparties, and because the Isle of Man is not grey-listed, that automatic trigger does not arise.
Absence from the lists does not switch off transparency obligations. Isle of Man financial institutions must still identify reportable accounts and file annually under CRS and FATCA, with data exchanged onward to relevant jurisdictions including the United States.
Two EU mechanisms that catch listed jurisdictions are also off the table here. DAC 6 reporting under Hallmark C.1.b.ii and the Public Country-by-Country Reporting Directive both fasten onto Annex I, or onto sustained Annex II tenure, and neither describes the Isle of Man.
Banking access carries no list-driven restriction. No correspondent-banking limits flow from FATF or EU status, though individual banks may still apply elevated scrutiny to structures in a 0% corporate-tax jurisdiction as a matter of their own risk appetite rather than any regulatory rule.
A residual perception risk remains worth planning for. The island's 0% headline corporate rate and offshore-centre profile mean press coverage and internal bank assessments may still label it a "tax haven", even with no formal listing to support the label.
Outlook: How the Isle of Man's Listing Status Is Likely to Evolve
The EU position shows no near-term risk. The island has been off Annex II since 2019 and has never appeared on Annex I, with substance legislation and BEPS commitments holding firm.
The pivotal event is the October 2026 MONEYVAL on-site visit for the 6th Round Mutual Evaluation. Outcome ratings from that round will decide whether the island exits enhanced follow-up or receives a fresh action plan; a weak effectiveness score could in theory invite grey-listing, but the 39-of-40 technical rating and the standing Financial Crime Strategy point to readiness.
On the OECD front, the November 2025 substance monitoring found most no or nominal-tax jurisdictions fully compliant and flagged only Anguilla and Turks and Caicos Islands. Pillar Two adds a stabilising element: by collecting the Domestic Top-up Tax itself, the island keeps that revenue, while companies below the revenue threshold continue to face the 0% rate, preserving its appeal for smaller international businesses.
Crypto-asset reporting rounds out the trajectory. With the first CARF period expected in 2026 and exchanges from 2027, successful delivery would further cement the cooperative-jurisdiction standing; the overall direction is toward deeper compliance.
Conclusion
For a non-resident owner, the practical reading is straightforward: the Isle of Man carries no EU or FATF listing, so the tax penalties, mandatory enhanced due diligence, and special reporting hallmarks tied to listed jurisdictions do not apply to structures based there. What remains are the ordinary transparency duties, CRS, FATCA, beneficial-ownership disclosure, and the bank-specific scrutiny that any low-tax centre attracts. The single event to watch is the October 2026 MONEYVAL evaluation, whose effectiveness ratings will shape the island's follow-up status. On the evidence available, the direction of travel favours continued cooperative standing rather than any slide toward a list.
How Expanship Can Help Your Business in Isle of Man
Expanship advises foreign owners on what Isle of Man listing status means for their structure, from confirming the absence of EU and FATF measures to preparing for the CRS, FATCA, and beneficial-ownership obligations that still apply. The same team supports the full lifecycle of a foreign-owned entity on the island.
- Company formation and entity structuring
- Registered agent and registered office services
- Tax registration and annual filing
- Ongoing compliance and statutory maintenance
- Accounting and bookkeeping
- Introductions to banking and payment providers
To discuss your requirements, contact Expanship Isle of Man.
Frequently Asked Questions
No. The Isle of Man appears on neither Annex I nor Annex II of the EU list of non-cooperative tax jurisdictions, a position confirmed at the 17 February 2026 update and underpinned by ECOFIN's 12 March 2019 finding that the island is cooperative on tax good governance.
The Isle of Man is not on the FATF grey list or black list. It is assessed by MONEYVAL, the Council of Europe regional body, and was rated positively on 39 of the 40 FATF Recommendations in its most recent full evaluation.
The earlier placement stemmed from EU economic-substance concerns rather than any transparency failing. The island introduced Economic Substance Legislation effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2019, requiring genuine local activity in mobile sectors, and was removed from the greylist that year.
No. Isle of Man financial institutions continue to report under the Common Reporting Standard and FATCA, and beneficial-ownership data is held in a central database under the Beneficial Ownership Act 2017. These duties apply regardless of the island's favourable list status.
No blanket correspondent-banking restrictions arise from FATF or EU list status, since the island is not listed. Individual banks may still apply elevated scrutiny to structures in a 0% corporate-tax jurisdiction, but that reflects their own risk appetite rather than a regulatory mandate.
The MONEYVAL on-site visit for the 6th Round Mutual Evaluation is confirmed for October 2026. The effectiveness ratings from that round will determine whether the island leaves enhanced follow-up or receives a revised action plan.
Legal Disclaimer
The information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax, or professional advice. While we strive to ensure the accuracy and timeliness of the content, laws and regulations are subject to change, and the application of laws can vary widely based on specific facts and circumstances.
Readers should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel tailored to their individual situation. Expanship and its authors disclaim any liability for actions taken or not taken based on the content of this article.
For specific advice regarding your business setup, compliance requirements, or any legal matters, please consult with qualified legal and tax professionals in the relevant jurisdiction.
