Listen to this article
0:00 / 20:46

Key Takeaways

  • Grenada maintains a limited treaty network, so foreign owners cannot assume broad double-taxation relief is available.
  • Double taxation agreements allocate taxing rights and can reduce withholding tax, but the benefits depend on the specific treaty and your residency.
  • Permanent establishment and tie-breaker rules determine where income is taxed, making treaty positions fact-specific for non-residents.
  • Anti-abuse measures such as limitation-on-benefits provisions and the principal-purpose test can deny relief to structures lacking genuine substance.

Grenada maintains one of the smallest tax treaty networks in the Caribbean, with four agreements in force: a single bilateral convention with the United Kingdom and the multilateral CARICOM Double Taxation Agreement, which itself reaches ten regional partners. Administration of these agreements falls to the Inland Revenue Division (IRD) within the Ministry of Finance, which also serves as the country's competent authority for international tax matters, as documented on the IRD international tax portal.

This report sets out what those agreements cover, how treaty benefits work in practice, and where the gaps lie for a foreign-owned entity. It is written for non-resident investors, business owners, and their advisers weighing a Grenada structure or assessing cross-border tax exposure.

The only bilateral double taxation agreement Grenada holds is with the United Kingdom, a Commonwealth-era convention that assigns taxing rights over specific income types and prevents the same income from being taxed in both countries. That convention entered into force on 2 May 1949 and was amended by a signed agreement on 25 July 1968, taking effect in Grenada from 1 January 1949.

The domestic instrument giving the convention effect on the UK side is SI 1949 No. 361, the Double Taxation Relief (Taxes on Income) (Grenada) Order. A separate exchange of information agreement between the two countries entered into force on 10 January 2012, both of which are published on the UK government's Grenada tax treaties page.

There is no income tax treaty between Grenada and the United States. The IRS A-to-Z treaty table does not list the country, confirming the absence of any US convention.

Grenada's tax agreements in force
Agreement Type In force for Grenada
United Kingdom DTA (SI 1949 No. 361) Bilateral 1 January 1949
UK Exchange of Information agreement Bilateral EOI 10 January 2012
CARICOM Double Taxation Agreement Multilateral (10 partners) 1 March 1996

Set against regional peers, the contrast is stark. Barbados leads CARICOM with 29 treaties with non-regional countries, while Grenada's bilateral reach beyond the CARICOM agreement stops at the UK alone.

Company Incorporation in Grenada

Set up your company in Grenada with Expanship handling registration end to end.

The CARICOM agreement carries the formal title Agreement Among the Governments of the Member States of the Caribbean Community for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income, Profits or Gains and Capital Gains and for the Encouragement of Regional Trade and Investment. It was signed in St. Michael, Barbados on 6 July 1994, and entered into force for Grenada on 1 March 1996.

Ten CARICOM parties have ratified: Antigua and Barbuda, Belize, Dominica, Grenada, Guyana, Jamaica, St. Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, and Trinidad and Tobago. Ratification details are recorded by the CARICOM Secretariat.

A distinctive feature sits in Article 5. Income of whatever nature accruing to any person is taxable only by the member state in which it arises, regardless of the recipient's nationality or residence.

This source-only rule departs sharply from conventional treaty design. The agreement broadly follows the 1980 UN Model Double Taxation Convention rather than the OECD Model, mirroring the development-focused priorities of its drafters.

The treaty ran without amendment through its first 29 years. The CARICOM Council for Finance and Planning (COFAP) has since decided to modernise it, and with OECD support a protocol adding automatic exchange of information and dispute settlement has been finalised. The 1994 instrument replaced an earlier 1973 MDC/LDC tax agreement that had linked the more developed members with less developed ones, Grenada among the latter.

A double taxation agreement is a formal pact between two states that sets out how cross-border income is taxed. Without one, the same income stream can be taxed twice, in the country where it arises and again where the recipient resides, which discourages investment and mobility.

These agreements allocate taxing rights, and often cap them, across income categories such as employment earnings, business profits, capital gains, dividends, interest, royalties, and pensions. A resident of one contracting state may then face a reduced rate, or full exemption, on certain income arising in the other; the precise relief differs by country and income type.

Most modern treaties carry a "saving clause" preventing a resident of one state from using treaty provisions to escape source-country tax. Worth keeping in view is Grenada's own territorial system, under which residents are taxed only on income earned within the country.

That domestic feature matters for any reading of the treaties. Foreign-sourced income, including offshore investments, foreign employment, and business profits earned abroad, falls outside the Grenadian tax base for residents, reducing the day-to-day reliance on outbound treaty relief.

Ongoing Compliance in Grenada

Keep your Grenada entity compliant with filings, returns, and statutory obligations.

The UK convention defines a permanent establishment in Article 2 as a branch, management, or other fixed place of business. An agency is excluded unless the agent habitually exercises general authority to negotiate and conclude contracts, or holds a stock of goods from which orders are regularly filled.

The same article clarifies that a subsidiary trading in the other territory does not, by itself, create a permanent establishment of its parent. This protects group structures from inadvertent taxable presence under the bilateral treaty.

The CARICOM agreement, by contrast, is silent on permanent establishment entirely. The International Bar Association has flagged this structural gap as a recurring source of difficulty for businesses, accountants, and lawyers operating across the region, in its analysis of the CARICOM treaty.

Dual-residence tie-breakers are not clearly documented

Neither the 1949 UK convention nor the CARICOM agreement sets out modern tie-breaker tests (habitual abode, centre of vital interests, nationality) in the retrieved public sources. The UK instrument predates OECD Model tie-breaker language, so dual-resident cases warrant direct professional review.

For domestic purposes, the IRD treats an individual as tax-resident after more than 183 days in the country during a year. A company is resident if it is registered in Grenada or has its head office located there.

Payments such as dividends made by a Grenada resident to a non-resident attract a 15% withholding tax, collected by the IRD. Whether a treaty reduces that charge depends entirely on the counterparty's location.

Under Article 11 of the CARICOM agreement, dividends are taxable only in the recipient's residence state. The source state therefore cedes its withholding rights on dividends flowing to fellow CARICOM members, consistent with the treaty's source-only design.

The UK convention addresses dividends in Article 6 and royalties in Article 7, alongside provisions for industrial and commercial profits, shipping and air transport, employment income, pensions, and several other categories. The HMRC Digest of Double Taxation Treaties (April 2018) references the treaty under SI 1949 No. 361, but the precise numerical withholding rates are not set out in the retrieved public sources; advisers should consult SI 1949 No. 361 directly.

Two further points shape the practical picture. Grenada imposes no capital gains tax on the sale of property, removing a planning layer that might otherwise call for treaty relief, and no US treaty relief exists for Grenada-sourced income paid to Grenada residents, given the absence of any US convention.

Grenada Incorporation Pricing

See transparent pricing to incorporate and maintain a company in Grenada.

The competent authority for Grenada, including for FATCA purposes, is the Inland Revenue Division within the Ministry of Finance. It administers inland revenue law and collects the country's taxes and licences.

Anyone registering with the IRD receives a Tax Identification Number (TIN), which must be quoted in all correspondence. A non-resident may appoint a representative, a lawyer, accountant, customs broker, or tax professional, by lodging a letter of authorisation; the representative can then register, access accounts, make enquiries, and update records.

The IRD runs an online system, G-TAX, through which users register, file returns, pay, view obligations, request refunds and tax clearance certificates, and raise objections.

  • Obtain a TIN by registering with the IRD
  • Appoint an authorised representative where you cannot deal with the IRD directly
  • Use the G-TAX portal for registration, filing, and clearance requests
  • UK residents claiming under the UK convention apply through HMRC under SI 1949 No. 361

Specific forms, processing times, or fees for formally invoking treaty relief are not publicly documented in the retrieved sources. Non-residents should approach the IRD directly through G-TAX to confirm the procedure.

Grenada has not signed the BEPS Multilateral Instrument (MLI). The MLI covers 102 jurisdictions and roughly 1,900 bilateral treaties, and Grenada appears among none of them, a point confirmed in the OECD's Sixth Peer Review Report on Action 6, which uses data as at 31 May 2023.

Neither of Grenada's substantive treaties carries modern anti-abuse architecture. The 1949 UK convention predates limitation-on-benefits clauses and the Principal-Purpose Test, and the CARICOM agreement, modelled on the 1980 UN Model, contains no LOB or PPT as originally enacted.

The consequence is a network with no binding PPT, no LOB, and no MLI overlay. Anti-abuse protection rests on domestic Grenadian law alone, pending any BEPS-aligned provisions introduced through the CARICOM update protocol.

MLI adoption across the region is uneven. Barbados is a party and has listed the CARICOM treaty as a covered tax agreement, while Trinidad and Tobago has not signed, illustrating the patchwork across CARICOM members.

Practical effect shows in litigation. In the Methanex case, a Barbados court found that the CARICOM treaty's stated purpose did not prevent companies formed by third-state nationals, solely to secure preferential treatment, from claiming treaty benefits, underlining how little anti-shopping protection the agreement offers.

With one bilateral treaty and one multilateral agreement, the network is among the smallest in the Caribbean. No DTAs have been verified with the United States, Canada, EU member states, China, or any Asian or Middle Eastern jurisdiction.

Treaty protection against source-country withholding on payments flowing into a Grenada entity is therefore available only from the UK and from CARICOM counterparties. Income from major hubs such as the US, Germany, France, the Netherlands, Singapore, or the UAE receives no treaty-based reduction; those countries' domestic rates apply in full.

The territorial tax system softens the impact for the entity itself. Because foreign-source income is not taxed domestically, the practical need for outbound treaty relief is reduced, though not removed.

Within the region the picture is more favourable. The CARICOM source-only rule can suit intra-Caribbean trade, but its silence on permanent establishment leaves cross-border service businesses without clear guidance on taxable presence.

No treaty conduit to the US or major EU markets

A Grenada structure does not provide effective treaty access to reduced withholding in the United States or major European Union jurisdictions. Advisers should not assume treaty shopping through a Grenada entity will lower withholding in those markets.

Grenada is described as working to widen its treaty network, with negotiations reportedly underway with several countries to attract investment and strengthen economic ties. No partner jurisdiction, draft text, or signing date has been officially announced in the retrieved sources.

The CARICOM-level COFAP process, supported by the OECD, is the most concrete reform directly affecting Grenada. Its protocol adds exchange of information and dispute settlement to the multilateral treaty, bringing it closer to international standards.

The country's non-signature of the MLI remains the principal brake on rapid modernisation. Joining would allow BEPS minimum standards to be applied to existing treaties without bilateral renegotiation, against a global backdrop of more than 3,000 treaties in force and rising treaty activity among developing economies.

Grenada's treaty position is narrow and, in places, dated: meaningful relief reaches only the United Kingdom and fellow CARICOM states, while payments from the US, Canada, the EU, and Asia attract full domestic withholding abroad. The territorial tax system offsets much of this for Grenada-based entities, since foreign-source income escapes domestic tax in any event. For a non-resident owner, the sensible posture is to treat treaty relief as a regional and UK-specific benefit, not a route to reduced withholding in the world's larger capital markets. Structuring decisions should rest on the domestic regime and verified treaty coverage, with professional review of any cross-border flow.

Expanship advises foreign owners on how Grenada's treaty network and territorial tax system bear on a proposed structure, and handles the IRD registration, TIN, and representative arrangements that treaty and withholding matters require. The same team supports the full life cycle of a foreign-owned entity, from formation through ongoing reporting.

  • Company incorporation and entity setup in Grenada
  • Registered agent and registered office services
  • Tax registration with the IRD and routine filing
  • Ongoing compliance and statutory obligation management
  • Accounting and bookkeeping for cross-border operations
  • Introductions to banking partners for account opening

To discuss your structure and confirm what treaty coverage applies to your income flows, contact Expanship Grenada.

No. There is no income tax treaty between Grenada and the United States, and the country does not appear on the IRS treaty table. US-sourced income paid to a Grenada resident receives no treaty-based withholding reduction.

Grenada holds four agreements in force: a bilateral convention with the United Kingdom and the multilateral CARICOM Double Taxation Agreement, which covers ten regional partners. Beyond these, no DTAs with Canada, EU states, China, or Middle Eastern jurisdictions have been verified.

Dividends paid by a Grenada resident to a non-resident normally attract 15% withholding tax. Under Article 11 of the CARICOM agreement, dividends are taxable only in the recipient's residence state, so the source-state charge is ceded for fellow CARICOM members; specific UK rates require reference to SI 1949 No. 361.

No. Grenada is not among the 102 jurisdictions covered by the MLI, which means its treaties carry no Principal-Purpose Test, no limitation-on-benefits clause, and no MLI overlay. Anti-abuse protection currently rests on domestic law.

Register with the Inland Revenue Division to obtain a Tax Identification Number, which must be quoted in all dealings, and use the G-TAX online portal for filings and clearance requests. You may appoint a local representative by submitting a letter of authorisation; specific treaty-relief forms are not publicly documented, so confirm the procedure with the IRD directly.

To a significant degree, yes. Because residents and companies are taxed only on Grenada-sourced income, foreign-source earnings are not subject to Grenadian tax, lowering the practical need for outbound treaty relief, though treaties remain relevant for income flowing into a Grenada entity from the UK or CARICOM states.